Speaker Break In...? Or listener “Break In”?

@b_limo

Im interested in opinions regarding which has more impact; a speaker changing sound over the first 100-200 hours or a listener becoming more in tune with a certain speakers qualities and characteristics.

Since we all hear what we hear, I'm not sure that there is an answer that everyone will accept....but a somewhat "inexpensive" test might be to buy a pair of Dirty Weekends from Zu which according to their website... Omen DW loudspeakers now get 100 hours of fully assembled, max-level burn-in so they will sound great right out of the box. 

In theory, given the Zu burn in of the loudspeaker, the buyer should notice almost no change in sound from original set up...and if they are noticing a change, then it must be them, the listener more than the speaker.

Also, according to Zu, the Soul Supreme gets 600 hours....so this, in theory, would eliminate any chance of speaker burn in.

Granted, all of the above may only apply to Zu and not to other loudspeakers...but it would be interesting to hear from Zu owners as to their experience.

Oh, I dunno about all that. Depends on HOW the speakers - or anything - are broken in. Some methods are without any doubt more effective than others. We’ve known that for a very long time. I’m referring to burn-in tracks on Test CDs continuously as opposed to just playing music a few hours a day. The argument can be made the speakers will never completely break in without heroic efforts. 🏋🏻‍♂️

Here is some more evidence supporting burn in.http://http//www.gr-research.com/burnin.htm and
http://www.gr-research.com/myths.htm

I can't make that first link work for some reason. You can copy and paste it. Interesting read:  gr-research.com/burnin.htm

Break-in? The more I listen to a speaker the worse it sounds.