SVS SUBWOOFERS

I saw them and heard them. Even wenn you give them me for free I would not want these f.....ugly sub's. They are too slow.

I was looking at those, too. I wrote and also called the company and got great responses both ways. I wanted the most musical subs for a stereo, with Maggie 1.7s. They suggested their sealed cubes, SB 13 Ultras. So, I think if you are looking for home theater, their larger cylinder subs are great, but the sealed ones are better for music. I ended up using their suggested crossover points as well. I use them in stereo, sounds much better than dual mono, and I use an Antimode Cinema for each. I think you should consider something like that, unless you have an AV receiver that can reduce room created peaks. The subs have a lot of ability themselves, but you need equipment that can identify just where those peaks are. So, while I can't speak about those particular subs, I think very well of the company and their products in general.

09-21-13: Bo1972
"I saw them and heard them. Even wenn you give them me for free I would not want these f.....ugly sub's. They are too slow."

Are you speaking about the PC subs or all SVS subs? If the SVS SB13 Plus or SB13 Ultra are considered slow, then I have no clue what fast is. The Revel B15 is usually thought of as a fast and rhythmic subwoofer and from what I have observed, the SB13Plus is just as fast. Though neither are servo controlled, both implementations mimic servo characteristics(speed, timing) pretty well IMO.

Bill

I tested many subwoofers in 15 years of time. You Always need a closed subwoofer with only one bass unit in the front to get stealth integration. SVS does not have the fastest response in movement of the speakerunits. How you test this? Always in stereo to hear if the subwoofder integrates with the speakers and if the proportion of the instruments and voices keep there small proportions. Many subwoofers are not good enough. For example: Jacintha in her name numer 6 of the album. The contrabass is on the left side of the recording. The weight and energy need to be on the left side also wenn the sun is on the right side of the speakers. Many subwoofers are not able to get the energy and low freq. touchable like it would be with stereo speakers only. With Audyssey pro and extrme fast subwoofers I can get full stealth integration with subwoofers and that instruments and voices keep the right dimensions. Wenn you use 3 bassports in a sub they speed is slow as hell. It is that simple!!

"I tested many subwoofers in 15 years of time. You Always need a closed subwoofer with only one bass unit in the front to get stealth integration."

Bo,
I don't doubt your experience, obviously much more than me.

I have two sealed subs up front, one in each corner and another 10" sealed in midpoint of room next to my main listening chair.

"SVS does not have the fastest response in movement of the speakerunits."

If that is so, what is your opinion on the Revel B15?

"How you test this? Always in stereo to hear if the subwoofder integrates with the speakers and if the proportion of the instruments and voices keep there small proportions."

The Revel B15 has an integrated 3-band parametric equalizer which is used in conjunction with it's LFO software and an SPL meter. Most of my integration with the Revel B15 is in stereo. Pretty seamless indeed. I bought the SVS SB13 Plus to give my 6000ft3 room some added pressurization for HT but it integrated so well musically with the Revel B15 that I run all three subs all the time.

"Many subwoofers are not good enough. For example: Jacintha in her name numer 6 of the album."

Take classical music out of the equation and then how does the SVS sealed(or ported) subs measure up?

Bill