LMAO @larryi great post!
Tang Band 2145 in action
Ck out the sunning , sparkling highs.
WOWWW
Hardly need to add a tweeter. = can if you wish. just add any of your fav tweets, + with a simple 2.2 or 3.3 cap.
As I said previously, both the TB2145 ad DLVX8 both are very close in performance.
can't go wrong with either.
Truly a magical sound image.
Jazz fans especially take note of this speaker.
You always wanted life like sound stage, with no added baggage???
'Well the TB2145 has your order.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCaXHrwotKU&t=1s
WOWWW
Hardly need to add a tweeter. = can if you wish. just add any of your fav tweets, + with a simple 2.2 or 3.3 cap.
As I said previously, both the TB2145 ad DLVX8 both are very close in performance.
can't go wrong with either.
Truly a magical sound image.
Jazz fans especially take note of this speaker.
You always wanted life like sound stage, with no added baggage???
'Well the TB2145 has your order.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCaXHrwotKU&t=1s
- ...
- 145 posts total
What led me away 20 yrs ago from considering a WBer as my speaker of choice, , is that folks were posting something about a WBer needing SET amps.. It may be partly true I’ve not heard a SET, But I don’t think I’ll like the 845 sound. I prefer the EL34/KT88 type tube Truth is, you can drive a WBer with just about any amplifer. From the Jadis JA 800 4 chassis, 500 watts, all the way down to a SET 10 watt. It certianly would be a waste of amp power to match a WBer 92 db sens to the JA800, wasted 490 watts. There seems to be lack of understanding what the WBers are all about, how they perform and what are their potentials ina set up with other low sens drivers as assist mode. This is a whole new field waiting for discovery and developments. IMHO this set up is the speaker of choice for the 21st C audiophile. We just need more adventurers, more experimentations. Seems the Thors dual W18's will be useful afterall. Adding nice bottom end to the DavidLouis VX8. MORE than enough deep rich bass. Especially with my added EL34 amp, which has more bottom than the Defy . But then i should say the Defy has kt88's that have 3k++ hours,, this may be a factor in Defy's lower performance vs the Dynaco clone ST70, with huge trans. |
Consider me the counter weight to Stereophile's pumping spakers past 20+ years. Seas Thors worlds finest speaker. Before I closed out this post,, I decide to google **Seas Thor Review*** If you don't believe my opinion, ck this snakeoil-LESS review. **what caught my immediate attemtion,,,,,lack of coloration or OBFUSCATION** ,, = NO muddiness, like every xover box design I ever heard in my 40 yrs. All, A-Z suffer muddy midrange, . Lone exception is SEas Thor You guys just have no faith in my opinions,. Trust me Seas made the very finest Midwoofers/Millennium tweeter vs any other midwoofer/tweet on the palnet (IN ITS DAY, 2004.,,may have been surpassed, in the tweeter, not the MAGNESIUM midwoofer, which can never be surpassed. Magnesium destroys paper composites due to its lack of coloration neutralness in upper bass/lower mids.... Paper composites have a deep punch in lowest bass notes. Like drums. The WBers equal Seas Exel's neutrality/lack of coloration /detailed soundstage. Sorry Mr Wilson , your $950K speakers have their issues. Issues the Seas Thor has none of https://www.audioasylum.com/messages/speakers/302966/review-seas-thor-speakers |
- 145 posts total