Tekton Double Impacts


Anybody out there heard these??

I have dedicated audio room 14.5x20.5x9 ft.  Currently have Marantz Reference CD/Intergrated paired to Magnepan 1.7's with REL T-7 subs.  For the vast majority of music I love this system.  The only nit pick is that it is lacking/limited in covering say below 35 hz or so.  For the first time actually buzzed the panel with an organ sacd. Bummer.  Thought of upgrading subs to rythmicks but then I will need to high pass the 1.7's.  Really don't want to deal with that approach.

Enter the Double Impacts.  Many interesting things here.  Would certainly have a different set of strengths here.  Dynamics, claimed bottom octave coverage in one package, suspect a good match to current electronics.

I've read all the threads here so we do not need to rehash that.  Just wondering if others out there have FIRST HAND experience with these or other Tekton speakers

Thanks.
corelli
Post removed 
Invictus005, I'm certainly not "embarrassed" to have my name on it. So you're a patent lawyer and an audio guru? The patent is certainly defensible.   

Now, anyone can easily type a 30 second reply and level an ad hominem fallacy like you have. Please take some time and really put some thought and effort into a proper response. A response that truly has some meat on the bones. Prove me wrong. Where did I go wrong in my patent claims?

Eric Alexander - audio designer
 
@invictus005 I read nothing of value to your sweepingly negative and unfounded opinion. Everyone's a patent attorney and a critic these days, it seems. 
@tektondesign They are very special to me too.  My hat's off to you sir.  The Encores have surpassed my wildest expectations.  Perfectly executed to these ears. 
Basically the only way to infringe your patent (and even that’s debatable) is to claim the same exact nonsense you do. But why would anyone want to do that? Other than that, thousands of other manufacturers can and do use these simple inexpensive Eminence and SB drivers and are free to arrange them in any flower petal shape they desire. 

If a common paper cone or textile dome matches the mass of a certain instrument that you claim and has this magical benefit, then we’ve all been doing the same exact thing for over 100 years. This is absurd.