The word 'best' exists for a reason. In the audio world though, defining what that even means is troublesome.
So what is the best? Is it something that everyone agrees on? no.
The best specs? Maybe, but likely not. Its now well-proven that what is important to our ears does not show up on paper very well, if at all.
I think it would be a bad idea to focus on any one characteristic and most audiophiles have different ideas about what is important.
So best, unfortunately IMO is only defined personally, and is inherently limited to the experience of the individual. IOW there can be something out there that is a whole lot better, but since its unknown to the individual, it does not exist.
So we ask. The problem here is that we have a vernacular that describes audio artifact or lack thereof, but the vernacular lacks the ability to transmit knowledge of intensity. The result is that one person can be describing a cheap transistor amp that might be the best they have ever heard, and the person he is talking to is used to much better equipment, maybe a $20,000 tube amp, yet they are using exactly the same descriptions to describe very different experiences.
So, IMO, while there is a best, there is no way that we can talk about it intelligently. So it might be wise to ask a different question!
So what is the best? Is it something that everyone agrees on? no.
The best specs? Maybe, but likely not. Its now well-proven that what is important to our ears does not show up on paper very well, if at all.
I think it would be a bad idea to focus on any one characteristic and most audiophiles have different ideas about what is important.
So best, unfortunately IMO is only defined personally, and is inherently limited to the experience of the individual. IOW there can be something out there that is a whole lot better, but since its unknown to the individual, it does not exist.
So we ask. The problem here is that we have a vernacular that describes audio artifact or lack thereof, but the vernacular lacks the ability to transmit knowledge of intensity. The result is that one person can be describing a cheap transistor amp that might be the best they have ever heard, and the person he is talking to is used to much better equipment, maybe a $20,000 tube amp, yet they are using exactly the same descriptions to describe very different experiences.
So, IMO, while there is a best, there is no way that we can talk about it intelligently. So it might be wise to ask a different question!