The Big Misconception About Electricity

Come on Cindy.....You didn’t watch the video....so please keep the Harry Potter commentary to a minimum.

Go do something productive, water your plants, take a bath.

People that do not understand why AI is an incarnation of the perfect totalitarian state, also have very little knowledge of China’s Social Credit system.

These two system’s are actually one and the same, and are being implemented in the west. It’s not gloom and doom, it is commentary from people that are actually paying attention to what is already happening.

@mahgister

I consider him to be my greatest spiritual teacher/philosopher.

I watched the video @yuviarora , hence why I made the comments. Unfortunately, most people are pretty narrow in their thinking, the proverbial when your only tool is a hammer everything is a nail. Their only tool is electricity, and they use it like a hammer.  Problem is they are trying to hammer a nail into a piece of glass. Someone with a broader perspective would say, "you know the glass is going to break, right?". There is a lot more to creating a crater than it noting it looks like some very small scale similar phenomena. Everything does not simply scale to the larger phenomena.

The video claims that "book science" will never explain hexagonal craters (or something to that wording). However, that is wrong. Not only can it explain it, but simulations can replicate the result. I don't think having a theory that assumes other people are stupid is a good path to take ....

https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981ZNatA..36..410V/abstract

https://blog.pnas.org/2018/07/journal-club-researchers-mayve-finally-solved-mystery-of-crater-ray-formation/

@cindyment 

Unfortunately, most people are pretty narrow in their thinking, the proverbial when your only tool is a hammer everything is a nail. 

Now use the same logic to understand my critiques of the Gravitational model. 🙏 

@yuviarora , you are misinterpreting how I stated narrow. The people you link to w.r.t. the electric model are using a very very very narrow investigation to justify that it could be correct to illustrate the phenoma. That is why it falls flat on its face whenever actual scientists start to debunk. It is like shooting frogs in a barrel.

On the other hand, the gravity model, except at the universe level where we don't know how much matter there is, works exceptionally well to explain observed phenomena, and has been testing repeatedly and shown to be accurate.