The Big Misconception About Electricity

Here is another angle.

Cindy...before you say Fluid Dynamics, know this..

1) This structure extends 100’s of miles up into the Atmosphere on the Gas Giant.

2) The Concentric Hexagonal structures around the main central structure have been measured as having different Rotational speeds, and temperatures.

3) The Hexagonal North pole, and the corresponding South pole, have significantly Higher temperatures than the surrounding areas.

Please have at it. 

I can show you simple lab experiments done on Earth that account for all of this, no esoteric mathematics required. 

ADD: I couldn’t read the hexagonal impact paper, might be a paywall issue... anyhow this shape is very commonly associated with all sorts of electrical discharges.

Cymatics in 3D | Levitating water with sound

Oh look, a full simulation (not just a guess) and it accurately simulates other atmospheric phenomena ....

http://"Scientists could have finally demystified what's behind the hexagon on Saturn | SYFY WIRE" https://www.syfy.com/syfy-wire/what-is-up-with-that-hexagon-on-saturn?amp

"Scientists could have finally demystified what’s behind the hexagon on Saturn | SYFY WIRE" https://www.syfy.com/syfy-wire/what-is-up-with-that-hexagon-on-saturn?amp

“

While the simulation produced a nine-sided shape instead of the hexagon the scientists were expecting, this still suggests that Yadav and Bloxham are onto something.

“The hexagon is likely very deep,” they said. “Our model simultaneously and self-consistently produces alternating zonal jets, the polar cyclone, and hexagon-like polygonal structures similar to those observed on Saturn.”

Even if some bizarre life form could just barely survive on Saturn, it is unlikely anything would want to."

1) The formation goes very high up into the atmosphere.

2) This "Explanation" doesn’t even mention the concentric hexagonal zones

3) No mention of temperature variations

4) Shapes created in simulation are not Hexagonal.

5) It is a computer simulation....I can simulate a dragon fighting an orc...doesn’t mean anything.

Pay attention.....to...what you accept as evidence, when it is in defense of theories you already accept as being true.

Anything is good enough......."computer simulations"..... vaguely recreating 1 one of the parameters....is enough. Grabage in garbage out.

Do you see my point yet?