Were it not for the fact that I own and use an FR64S, I might take your critique very seriously, because "on paper" it makes sense. What I wrote above is based on my actual experience using the tonearm, and my experience is in contradiction to the theory you posit. Evidently, you had a different experience. This could be due to a difference in cartridge or headshell or in the construction of the tonearm mount. As noted, I am using it with an Acutex MI type cartridge; perhaps non-MC cartridges impart less energy into the headshell than do MC types. I am not using the FR headshell; I am using a lightweight aluminum headshell. Also, Halcro is using a carbon fiber headshell. For sure, this would make a drastic difference in the transmission of energy into the arm wand, compared to the clunky FR headshell and some others as well.
The Palladian-A step beyond
The new cartridge from Acoustical Systems may finally be the LOMC to fully realise the theoretical advantages of the genus.
And convince those long-suffering audiophiles to whom the 'modern' MC presentation has been anathema to 'live sound'....that the realism of vintage LOMCs like the SPUs and FR-7 series has finally been recaptured 👀
IMAGE 1
IMAGE 2
IMAGE 3
IMAGE 4
IMAGE 5
IMAGE 6
IMAGE 7
And convince those long-suffering audiophiles to whom the 'modern' MC presentation has been anathema to 'live sound'....that the realism of vintage LOMCs like the SPUs and FR-7 series has finally been recaptured 👀
IMAGE 1
IMAGE 2
IMAGE 3
IMAGE 4
IMAGE 5
IMAGE 6
IMAGE 7
- ...
- 391 posts total
- 391 posts total