Thiel Owners

For me, the SS2.2 is ideal, as you're not yanked up in your seat when the sub cuts in. Just the impression of the 2.7s low frequency being extended.   None of that  "Hey, there, I"m a SUB" 

Tom,
You wrote " I was at the Thiel factory when the final 2.7 arrived for confirmation, and we heard it compared repeatedly to the 3.7 with a couple different amps in the room that I knew extremely well ..."
What were those amps?

tms, I'm sorry I don't know the model numbers. One was a big Krell, another a pair of big Levinson monoblocs, and a Bryston. I was there on a visit and not really in the loop. Rob Gillum knows, but he is swamped with Coherent Source Service. I'll try to find out.

tms,
 I had two conversations with Jim Thiel while I was using the 3.5s. He steered me to the Bryston amplifiers. So far, I've had a 4B in its variations, and am now using a 4Bsst2 for the 2.7s. With a 20 year warranty, I don't have to worry if something goes kaput with the amp. 

ronkent,

Nice analogy. I agree the 3.7s do majesty. I always felt they never had me wanting for a larger speaker/bigger sound because they sounded so big!

I’ve been happily surprised at how large the 2.7s can sound as well. Never as large as the 3.7s, but I’ve now got them sounding quite reminiscent of the experience the 3.7s gave me. Rock music, symphony, jazz/fusion, when mic’d closely enough, really sound BIG and chunky in terms of imaging, and very big in terms of soundstaging. In fact in my long speaker audition thread, I’ve mentioned numerous times how coming back from a speaker audition to fire up the 2.7s usually makes the point of how huge their soundstage is relative to many other speakers.

Currently I have my 2.7s set up with 8’ 3" between them (from cabinet to cabinet), and just under 7 feet from my listening position. So that’s an immersive listening angle. What type of listening angle did you use, and do you use with the 3.7s?