Eric at Tekton is one of those dr jekyll mr hyde types. I would boycott Tekton altogether after listening to his absurd behavior toward Erin. Amir, I could care less about because he doesn’t even listen to a lot of the gear he measures in the first place, misleads end-users and trashes gear un-constructively. I’m amazed Amir hasn’t been sued into oblivion already. Erin did a standup job and Eric owes him a huge public apology.
Thin Line Between Critique and Courtrooms: A Dialogue on the Recent Audiophile Drama
Hey Audiogonians,
In the vast, vibrant universe of audio reviews, where the line between subjective opinion and objective analysis often blurs, a new saga unfolds. It involves a Youtuber, well-known within our community for their take on speaker designs – designs that, while innovative, haven't shied away from criticism. The plot thickens with another Youtuber's revelation: the speaker's designer and manufacturer has filed a lawsuit against a reviewer over their less-than-glowing feedback.
The core of the debate? Whether it's acceptable to push back against reviewers when their findings diverge from what manufacturers desire. It's not a new drama; history is littered with tales of reviewers facing legal threats for daring to express their truth. Yet, each story brings a fresh perspective on the delicate dance between free speech and brand reputation.
This particular episode raises several intriguing questions:
- Where do we draw the line between constructive criticism and damaging feedback?
- Is the courtroom really the arena for settling disputes over reviews, or should dialogue prevail?
- And crucially, what does this mean for the future of honest, independent audio reviews?
This isn't just about the nitty-gritty of legal battles, many of which remain cloaked in confidentiality and technical jargon. It's about the principle: the right to voice one's opinion in a space that thrives on diversity of thought.
So, fellow audiophiles, what's your take? Have you ever felt swayed by a review, only to discover a different truth upon listening? Have you faced the ire of those who didn't appreciate your candid feedback?
📢Let's make this a discussion to remember – not just for the controversy, but for the unity and respect we can foster, even in disagreement.
- ...
- 266 posts total
Amir does have an obvious slant, but measurements are important in making buying decisions. Hence, why all the flowery wordsmiths of the main audiophile press, I ignore. I make the decisions with MY EARS, not theirs. I have watched all the videos, Eric did it right - he was upfront and open about it. Tekton left a bad taste in his mouth, because it was so passive/aggressive. I have heard Tekton's many times, as I know people who have many pairs of them. None of them have ever impressed me with their sound, but that is me. |
Sorry i dont see which post of me you refer too ... 😁 You must had cited the post ... My last post is a one line approval of a common place fact ...😊
Anonymously here disdain often appear as hate especially if repeated behaviour , and i dont know what you refer to about juvenile loathing and petty behaviours... i rarely speak in enigmas here ... But directly.... It is more simple this way ...
|
I agree measurements are important. What I’m saying is Amir misguides end-users by teaching them that unless gear measures well, that means it’s no good and he’s just absolutely dead wrong. The guy is a very strange individual and takes measurements too extreme and I’m astonished that people even trust his judgement. He doesn’t match gear properly and relies only on measurements and trashes gear that doesn’t measure to his likes. That’s absurd. If he doesn’t even take the time to listen to the gear he measures, then he’s just too one sided. He’s a really weird individual. If he was sued, I wouldn’t feel bad for him. Erin on the other hand a really nice guy. He makes measurements, BUT he also listens to the gear he tests to determine if the measurements are audible. That’s a great approach. I have nothing against measurements but there has to be a balance. Amir is way off the deep end. |
Amir ideology is called techno-cultism... It is pervasive in A.I. sleepwalking engineers crowds with no deep understanding of what is at stake in society right now... This cult is born from hubris as soon as after the materialism dominate Anglo saxon Empire and the world after the victorious nominalism.It was a necessary stage for the advent of science but not the only one. Techno cultism act of birth is just after Goethe Faust which denounce its blindness and denounced the replacement of the " free philosopher of nature" by the deal make in hell with the specialised unfree scientists working for the power in place and his corporations . In 1836 Wavell and Babbage, the father of A.I. in a reunion asked for the replacement of the title "philosopher of nature" by the shorter name "scientist" . Then the free philosopher was replaced by unfree specialised and controlled servant of corporate satanic powers. The same powers William Blake denounced in his own ways . Techno cultism is a religious faith toward the only incoming God : A.I. For them only measures are real. Human live in illusions. 😊
The modern era produce uneducated specialised slave workers called "scientists"; ask a doctor. many did subordinate Hippocrates oath to big pharma controls, if not tey are ejected as incompetent. I will stop here ...😊 History teach well . |
- 266 posts total