@mahgister stop talking
Thin Line Between Critique and Courtrooms: A Dialogue on the Recent Audiophile Drama
Hey Audiogonians,
In the vast, vibrant universe of audio reviews, where the line between subjective opinion and objective analysis often blurs, a new saga unfolds. It involves a Youtuber, well-known within our community for their take on speaker designs – designs that, while innovative, haven't shied away from criticism. The plot thickens with another Youtuber's revelation: the speaker's designer and manufacturer has filed a lawsuit against a reviewer over their less-than-glowing feedback.
The core of the debate? Whether it's acceptable to push back against reviewers when their findings diverge from what manufacturers desire. It's not a new drama; history is littered with tales of reviewers facing legal threats for daring to express their truth. Yet, each story brings a fresh perspective on the delicate dance between free speech and brand reputation.
This particular episode raises several intriguing questions:
- Where do we draw the line between constructive criticism and damaging feedback?
- Is the courtroom really the arena for settling disputes over reviews, or should dialogue prevail?
- And crucially, what does this mean for the future of honest, independent audio reviews?
This isn't just about the nitty-gritty of legal battles, many of which remain cloaked in confidentiality and technical jargon. It's about the principle: the right to voice one's opinion in a space that thrives on diversity of thought.
So, fellow audiophiles, what's your take? Have you ever felt swayed by a review, only to discover a different truth upon listening? Have you faced the ire of those who didn't appreciate your candid feedback?
📢Let's make this a discussion to remember – not just for the controversy, but for the unity and respect we can foster, even in disagreement.
- ...
- 266 posts total
@bivhopkins I concur with your suggestion @mahgister Biv... has been on Audiogon almost as long as you, just the man of fewer words, this does not mean he is forbidden to suggest. |
Do you understand the difference between an imperative and a polite invitation or suggestion? Especially after a meaningful post of mine explaining why i dont share Amir ideology even if i like his work ? «Imperative verbs work by issuing a command to the person being addressed. » Now is this man of "few words" know the difference between an order given to a poster he never discussed with and a polite and friendly suggestion ?
The question here is about not the number of words but about their meanings and context and about politeness and civility...We share ideas as humans we do not impose orders as a gang of apes... My post suggested a relatively short thoughtful reflection , his post is an emotional uncontrolled reaction bordering on insult the way it is given ...😊 Your interpretation then reflect your own emotional reaction not the discussion context at all.. You dont like reading a poster skip him ... We are not all on the same levels about everything here ... Then respect is recommended even for man of "few words" ... Sorry i am not a man of "few words" ... 😊😁 i treat everyone as friends here ... I am made this way but i answer to those who attack me politely but with arguments ...
If you want to create a burst of violence in a jail play Mozart music said to me one of my psychologist friend. I hope that we are not in a jail with brutes on the brink to explode if someone put "mozart" thoughtful music here. 😊 i like thinking sorry...
|
I think it’s fair to say @mahgister is guilty of smiley face emoji abuse. 😜😝🙄 |
- 266 posts total