Thumbs up for ultrasonic record cleaning
@tomic601, As far as my tech manual, it took a bit of turn, and it now stands at 54 pages. The manual cleaning procedure is not very long, but I am adding a lot of details of the rationale behind various steps, cleaning agents and rinsing and I expanded it to address vacuum RCM and some discussion for ultrasonic cleaning (but not a detailed procedure), and maintenance of cleanliness with a discussion of triboelectric effect and record brushes which was a bit eye opening especially after I found a NASA study - long story short I no longer use a brush to dust, I use a piece of Kinetronics Tiger Anti-static cloth to remove (light swipe) surface dust https://www.kinetronics.com/product/anti-static-tiger-cloth/ , and use the Audioquest carbon brush only as a conductive brush - just barely touches the surface. The carbon fibers are very narrow and can penetrate deeply into the groove, but the carbon fibers while stronger than steel along the shaft, are brittle cross-wise and subject to breaking at the tips contaminating the groove. At the moment I am researching chemical material compatibility since there is a lot discussion but not a lot of real data, and there is some confusion. This is because there is so much difference between rigid-PVC such a PVC pipe, plasticized-PVC such a flexible hoses and some toys/art-works and then there is the vinyl-record which a copolymer of PVC&PVA of which there is very little evidence of containing plasticizer. So, while alcohol and detergents can extract plasticizer from plasticized PVC depending on the exposure time (I found two real test reports), the vinyl record does not appear to have any. But, I did find that isopropyl alcohol even diluted down to 5% - the vapors are flammable with a flashpoint - that was a surprise. The good thing about manual cleaning is that the record exposure time to the cleaning agents is very brief and there are no ignition hazards. But ultrasonic cleaning can leave the record exposed to cleaning solutions for extended durations and can present an ignition hazard to flammable vapors. FYI - distilled water is safe for extended durations. At this point I expect to complete my tech manual in about 30-days, then I need to find a home for it - no interest in selling/making any money - just wish to give it away as a public service. |
@tomic601,Jim, I use the Record Doctor Clean Sweep Brush https://www.amazon.com/Record-Doctor-Clean-Sweep-Brush/dp/B07M92LY78. The bristle diameters are not so narrow that they will deeply penetrate the groove - so there is very limited risk of record damage. And, nylon absorbs water and when it does, it softens - so again no risk to the record or bristle breakage - and nylon returns to its original properties after it dries. But, the bristle diameter is large enough to just cover the groove, so when brushing back & forth, a lot of fluid agitation/cavitation is formed in the groove and that deeply cleans the record groove and side wall ridges especially with a light foaming surfactant. And then when rinsing, the brush with just water is effective in removing all trace of cleaner for the same reason - but mostly just agitation. A similar brush is the Osage, http://www.osageaudio.com/select.htm. Neil |
