Tidal Speakers owners

TBG actualy its oposite- for my ears its the smaller wilsons that needs lot of atention to sound good and not" etched" and hyper detailed and exited( they can, and mostly sounds sound bad on dealers) are you saying that Tidal is more sensitive to setup?

Elviukai, yes, Tidal is a very honest instrument to reflect setup. Most of speakers may account for 50 to 70% influence to the sound of a system, Tidal may take less than 20%.

I used to own W/P 8, so I know Wilason is also sensitive to setup, but no matter how you change your setup, Tidal is in another class, I think the biggest difference is coherency, I heard new Sasha, big improvement from previous models, much balanced in every way, but Tidal Interpretate music in closer way.

Elviukai, I will not enter into a discussion of which speaker is most sensitive to associate equipment. All I will say is that some equipment make the Tidals sing. I know my preferences for speakers do not coincide with those that regularly get the nomination in the rags as "best of the show," so I can only reiterate what I said, I don't know why a Tidal dealer would undercut how they sound. Perhaps it is his not having access to better, perhaps it is profit margins, etc., but I have heard the Tidals not sound good at shows as well as them sounding outstanding, so much so that I decided to bite the bullet and buy them.

Tbg,Quanmer, thank you for Your answers.

Elviukai, you are welcome, to debate Wilson or other speakers, it's like to debate Nikon or Canon camera and lenses.

To me, Tidal is like Leica to me, if a guy can't tell the difference in image by his eyes between Leica and others, it is very difficult to say more.

I don't mean to look down to them, I start to appreciate the differences since I owned Leica, and make some test by myself. That is a long learn curve. Before that, I also thought Leica is just a "status" product.

Of course Canon or Nikon or Konica-Minota or etc... does make some outstanding product from time to time.