Dear @bdp24 : ""
it addresses the issue of the tonearm/cartridge resonance that is inherent in the LP phono system, REGARDLESS of the specific arm and cartridge. ""
That's the great contribution to the analog alternative but historically several of the vintage tonearm manufacturers, some way or the other, took in less " dramatica/effective " way the issue on the necessity of some kind of damping in their designs.
One way or the other all tonearm designers know the importance of damping and they try that their designs have it.
Triplanar, SME, Jelco, Technics, Schroeder, Reed, SAT, etc, etc did it.
A non-damped tonearm is just out of question and today and with all respect a design stupidity.
R.
That's the great contribution to the analog alternative but historically several of the vintage tonearm manufacturers, some way or the other, took in less " dramatica/effective " way the issue on the necessity of some kind of damping in their designs.
One way or the other all tonearm designers know the importance of damping and they try that their designs have it.
Triplanar, SME, Jelco, Technics, Schroeder, Reed, SAT, etc, etc did it.
A non-damped tonearm is just out of question and today and with all respect a design stupidity.
R.