2. pc-audio
  3. 1290919943

Transport, Touch or Mac Mini to Dac??

I have a PW Dac that I am running straight to my amps.
I have a Touch as a transport now, but am contemplating running a 2010 Mac Mini as a transport/server connected direct USB or converter to the PW Dac. I tried the Bridge but didn't find a lot of difference in comparison to the Touch and the server software is not ready yet.
I also still think that CDs through a high end player sound resolving and good.
Which transport route for maximum performance into the Dac?
Has anyone else tried the 2010 Mac Mini route?
mr_bill
4est
507 posts
 
I bet the Hiface will smoke a Touch due to the interfacing.
Ag insider logo xs@2x
aaronmadler
94 posts
 
Mr bill,
I have never done an A/B test between the Mac Mini to Hiface vs. the Touch. My only reason to purchase the M2Tech is that I believe the USB out is limited to 16/44 resolution and with the M2Tech, it allows 24/192 with greater resolution. It comes with either RCA or BNC connections. I use BNC as I've heard it is superior. I'm not sure if it is or is not.
dmccombs
112 posts
 
Mr. Bill,

I can't comment on the Touch, but my business partner here at Mach2Music uses the Hi-Face with his 2010 Mach2 Mac Mini and it sounds very good. He enjoys its ability to output hires.

Regards,
Mach2Music
Post removed 
swampwalker's avatar
swampwalker
5,138 posts
 
Tvad is right. I may be hopelessly old-fashioned but I bought or was given every one of the 900 or so cds I have ripped to my server. No free lunch!!!
More to discover