Tube Amp for Martin Logan Speakers


Hi, I love tube sound through my Martin Logan Aerius-i fronts and Cinema-i center. I currently have a Butler 5150 which is a hybrid, but it busted on me and would cost $700 to fix. I've had china stereo tube amps that were pretty good and gave true tube sound, but not enough drive for higher volumes. I live in condo, so not like I can blast music anyways but still. I got the Butler because I wanted 5 channel tube sound for home theatre (The piercing sound from my Denon 3801 receiver was not pleasant to my ears). It appears there are only three multi-channel tube amps around, from Mcintosh, Butler 5150, and Dared DV-6C. The latter two are hybrids, and the last one was one of the worst tube amps i've ever heard. I have no clue why 6Moons gave the Dared a 2010 award, but maybe it's because it produces only 65W.

So since multichannel tube amps are hard to come by, and they tend to be hybrid, I was thinking maybe it would be best to get three true tube monoblocks to power my fronts. Thing is I wonder if they will be underpowered for my speakers, and not sure which ones are decent for the price. Maybe China made ones would suffice, and they still go for pretty expensive price. I'm wondering if anybody knows of a decent powerful tube monoblock that is affordable, because I can't pay $3000 per block. or maybe best to just repair my Butler. Thing is, I'm not confident that it is reliable. The tubes are soldered in which is weird, and i've taken it to a couple repair guys who both said that the design is not good, because it's very tight inside and more susceptible to being fried from DC voltage areas. it's too sensitive.

Any suggestions for tube monoblocks, even if china made ones? the holy grail for me would be Mcintosh tube amp, but they are hard to come by. Thanks.

smurfmand70
^^ OK. Its my contention that reducing distortion in the reproduction chain leads to better fidelity/better sound, especially if the types of distortion we are reducing are the types to which the ear is particularly sensitive.

In this regard I favor sound quality over sound pressure (volume); I think you will find that most audiophiles do.

You can see in the specs of any amplifier (solid state, class D or tube) that the distortion is indeed higher driving a lower impedance load. If you think the distortion involved is negligible, its not, it usually is of the types that the ear cares more about.

This can be so significant that the use of an autoformer to raise the load impedance to an otherwise very capable solid state amplifier can result in improved sound. Were this not the case, the insertion of the autoformer would have adverse effects.

Here is the text of some communications that Paul Speltz (designer of the ZERO) has received from a well-known solid stage amplifier designer:

Hi Paul -

I hope you had a nice weekend out in the woods - it's cold out there!
I'm still enjoying the autoformers very much, and they are continuing
to improve as they break-in. I wanted to comment on why I finally
decided to try them (and wish I had a long time ago!). In the past, I
had always thought of autoformers as a "speaker tweak" or a kind of
crutch for amplifiers that couldn't handle difficult loads. I figured
that my amps could drive anything, so why worry about adding extra
boxes that I didn't need. Over the past several years, though, I have
been working more and more with line-level coupling transformers (part
of my new VRE-1 preamp design) and I have seen some evidence that
suggested to me that something in the nature of the load with the
transformers made the source driving circuits "happy," to use the
scientific term ;-) Thus I came to be interested in the autoformers as
a possible *amplifier tweak.* (I guess maybe you see them from the
speaker's point of view, while I tend to see things from the amp's
perspective.) Whatever the reason, they certainly work well, and I do
feel that the amp is "happier" with the conjugate load. Maybe it's
nothing more than a more benign impedance, but I suspect there is
something more at work. I suppose it might be possible to try them
with a high-efficiency,16 Ohm speaker as a test of some sort, but I
suspect that the sound would still improve with the autoformers.
Anyway, whatever the truth of the matter is, I am a convert.

Thanks again, Paul.

Happy holidays,

Steve McCormack
SMc Audio
03-26-14: Atmasphere
This can be so significant that the use of an autoformer to raise the load impedance to an otherwise very capable solid state amplifier can result in improved sound. Were this not the case, the insertion of the autoformer would have adverse effects.

OMG, it does, if the listener had ears. I've tried them on a very capable ss amp, and the sound took a bad turn for the worse.

Quotes: from the Dick Olsher review that was convienently left out of the excerpts of the reveiw of the link you provided on the Zero website, read between the lines, we all know that reviewers don't like to rock the boat too much.

"It is not a panacea, and as you can see from my experience, it does not always pan out. However, if you're the proud owner of an OTL or a low-power tube amplifier and presently driving a 4-ohm loudspeaker load, you owe it to yourself to give the ZERO a try."

Cheers George
Atmasphere, on the surface, I don't think anyone would argue that reducing distortion would be a good thing. But we have seen when distortion reduction specifically and unto itself with disregard for the whole can cause more harm than good.
From the above; it seems that Steve McCormack's thinks that the autoformers made his amp "happier". Well, I might believe that, but that unto itself doesn't mean a whole lot when considering the whole lot.
There is apparently more to low impedance than just "sound pressure" (I'm not putting words in your mouth, am I?). For many years in the past, and very much in the present, and I'll hazard a guess, that for many years into the foreseeable future there will be speakers with low impedances with high end aspirations. I would caution those considering acquiring loudspeakers not to dismiss loudspeakers that have low impedances. There are many, many superior loudspeakers that might be missed out on. There are many amplifiers capable of driving them just as they come from the factory.
With all due respect, we've going back and forth on this subject for years now. Unless there is a drastic change in the audio landscape; as long as you keep making the assertions:
"Now its a simple fact, that there is no good argument for lower impedance (4 ohms or less) loudspeakers in high end audio; that is to say if sound **quality** is your goal."
I will probably object. In an effort to save time and bandwidth, perhaps we can come to some sort of gentleman's agreement on how to deal with this in the future?
BTW, as I read it; George didn't call you stupid, he called one of your suggestions stupid, and that was after you called him a "troll", which was after he posted a link where he recommend your product. This line of posting is somewhat out of character for you. You're better than that. But, hey, we're all human.
Best Regards,
Unsound.
"You can see in the specs of any amplifier (solid
state, class D or tube) that the distortion is indeed higher
driving a lower impedance load. "

That is true, but still all relative, and 4 ohms does not
mean many amps stop performing well.

Needless to say, the amp has to be up to the task. Most
good quality SS amps these days are quite capable of
performing well into 4 ohms these days it seems. Lower
than that becomes more of an issue perhaps, but better to
listen and determine for ones self the whole story rather
than focus on any one technical scenario. 4 ohm loads are
quite common these days and for good design reasons, not by
error or ommission. There are many valid ways to achieve
excellent results.

Tube amps are a different beast that work best in different
scenarios and subject to their own unique distortion
characteristics, so comparing SS and tube amp distortions is
not apples/apples and of limite.d value IMHO
Folks, some may find the Stereophile article about "EPDR" quite interesting at this link:

http://www.stereophile.com/reference/707heavy/index.html

I think one important take-a-way is that speaker impedance ratings, by themselves, do not take into account the full picture of speaker's load difficulty. Other factors include a speaker's phase angle characteristics. Take a look at the Final 600i ESL. Talk about an amp ball-breaker.

But perhaps even more relevant to this thread and Ralph's comments is that most amps have a real world "SOA" re power dissipation that is a lot less than one might expect. As defined in the article, the acronym SOA stands for Safe Operating Area. Please note that an amp's SOA power dissipation contracts considerably as impedance decreases and negative phase angles increase in magnitude.

I'll let our techy members comment further, but suffice to say that low impedance loads can cause an amp to operate at or outside its SOA, thereby causing distortion. I surmise that if a particular brand amp's SOA is small when driving a low impedance load, the answer is to buy a more powerful amp that has a less restrictive SOA or try ZEROs.

Final two points. First, the article speaks about SS amps. Nonetheless, I surmise that similar principles apply to tube amps. I understand the SS amps hard clip while tube amps generally soft clip. But I think common to both types of amp is that distortion dramtically increases once the amp exceeds its SOA. The second point is that when Ralph uses the term "happy amp" he no doubt is referring to an amp that is operating within its SOA.

My heads hurts because I have no idea what I just wrote.

Goodnight.