Turntable Consolidation. Is it a Consideration?

OK I suspect I am through Stage 1 of my direct drive turntable phase. I currently have three tables in the house, which are as follows:

• Technics SP 10 MK II on stacked multi density plinth built by Larry Spence, with a Riggle 12" String Theory arm, and ZYX 4D cartridge.
• Denon DP75 in a VPI suspended plinth, with Acos GST 801 arm, and Ortofon AC90 cartridge
• Technics SP 10 MK II in SH10B3 obsidian plinth, SAEC 407 arm(have an EPA 250 to put on it), and Ortofon Cadenza Blue cartridge.

Three tables is just a bit much for my audio rack, and the whole thing is a bit cluttered. Add to the fact I have no place to put the monitor for the digital music server, which further clutters up the room.
One other thing I have observed, in my opinion, is that these three tables are very similar in presentation, that they are more alike than different, and that cartridge is the biggest difference in sound here. Eve in terms of arm, the performance level finds more common ground than differences. Now it could be argued that the system is not capable of resolving the final differences, and that might be possible. It consists of:

• Musical Fidelity Nuvista M3 integrated with factory upgrade
• Liberty Audio B2B-1 phono stage
• JBL 4365 speakers
• PS Audio P10 power conditioner
• Wireworld Eclipse 7 speaker wire, VH Audio Spectrum CU interconnects, PAG power cords

The problem is I like all three tables quite a bit, but since they sound so similar it doesn’t make sense to keep all of them. However, whenever I think of which one should go, I really get indecisive and perhaps a bit uncomfortable about moving one on. On the other hand, I cannot stand looking at this clutter on the top of my audio cabinet. I value the aesthetics of my room, and want it to be an inviting place where I can enjoy music, drink a neat whiskey, and even read a good book in peace.

So I am trying to come up with a solution. Each table is fitted with a single arm, and perhaps I can do something there. The Technics in factory plinth is an absolute gem and in almost perfect condition. It would seem a shame to tear it apart. The second SP 10 is in a beautiful plinth and its a classic look, and performs wonderfully. The Denon is an excellent table, but I am not fond of the VPI base. The springs are temperamental, and the base needs to have the dings sanded out of it and refinished. However I love the GST 801 arm, and have a hard time letting them go. This is the table that is the candidate for parting out, but the arm has an odd mounting length, and the VPI top plate does not use an arm board, but is drilled for that specific arm. Also the top plate weighs a ton since its 5 layers of steel with damping material between each layer. Truth is the base should be remarkable, and I have a hard time thinking it should go. But of all of them, this seems the most likely.

Sometimes I think I should send them all away, pick up a single statement type table like the new Technics SP 10R or MK III, and have a plinth built for multiple arms. Now that would be a huge behemoth, but I think I could fit it on my rack. Or I think I should keep one of these, as the sound is so similar. Then experiment and try one upper tier belt drive again, something like a SOTA Cosmos.

Afraid I really cannot make up my mind, but I do know that something has to be done in the future. Just not sure which way to go. I run one system, look to optimize it, and get the best possible sound I can attain. So multiple systems are out of the question. I have free run of the living room, but the rest of the house is for the rest of the family.