Tyler Ref Monitors vs. Dynaudio 1.3 MK11


I'm considering going to a monitor and am wondering if anyone has an opinion on how either of these would match with my system. Or any other suggestions. I currently own a pair of Dynaudio 72's. My price range is 1200-1500. I don't mind buying used. I listen to a little bit of everything but mostly blues, jazz, some rock and roots music. I don't need a massive amount of bass but would like something with some low level impact. My room is roughly 12x15. Here is the rest of my equipment. Thanks.

McCormack DNA125
Rogue 99 Magnum
Cary 303/100
Acoustic Zen Satori spk. cables
ZCable ic's.
jimmymac
I own a pair of tyler ref moniters and can highly recommend them, one of the best sounding speakers that I have heard in their price class. Ty has used and demo from time to time and will include a 2 yr warranty.
Do you like the 72's or are you looking for a different sound? Assuming you like them, and if you're interested in saving a bit of money, I can highly recommend the Contour 1.1's. They're a bit easier to drive than the 1.3's and a bit less placement sensitive. And they sound great. Or, by the time you buy stands, you'll have almost enough in the 1.3's to go to the floor-standing 1.8's (unless the monitor concept is something you're really striving for). They're probably the easiest floor stander in Dyn's line to drive, and your McComack would do so nicely, while being a nice step up in sound. -Kirk
I like the 72's just fine. They do however, get quite loud in my room without too much effort. I've been told I might be better off going with a higher quality monitor. I owned the Audience 50's before I got the 72's. I loved the 50's but needed a little more bass. I was thinking the 1.3's or the Tyler's would probably give me a more refined sound and a bit more bottom end.