The OP has enquired about a Particular Service from a Third Party.
This has evolved into others posting making known other Third Party Services, and their satisfaction with the works undertaken.
There is also the naming a few Brands that have been supplied as Donor Cartridges to receive a assessment from a Technician and also undergo a Treatment.
I am aware that the Cartridges being referred to are varied in their Brands/Models, so each Cartridge received back from the Third Party Service are more than likely a unique Model, such is my own.
Reporting on a Brand in such circumstances does not help others, due to the uniqueness of the Cartridge having undergone a Third Party Service.
I chose to report on the Comparison undertaken to the Original Model,
as it was done in Method that was quite accurate to carry out a comparison, but the known differences between the Models were not concealed.
The most important part of the report was that the method of purchasing a used Cartridge as a Donor and then using a Third Party Service, comes with a attached risk.
If a owned from New Cartridge is at a place of usage it could be improved upon by being serviced, I will suggest the Risk Factor seems to be a lesser concern for the Donor.
My experience being a outcome in my venture that was a workable one, and this will not be the outcome for all ventures.
I was letting a wider community know that I been supplied a Cartridge from a Third Party Service that was impressive and satisfying.
I think that is in keeping with the Thread.
This has evolved into others posting making known other Third Party Services, and their satisfaction with the works undertaken.
There is also the naming a few Brands that have been supplied as Donor Cartridges to receive a assessment from a Technician and also undergo a Treatment.
I am aware that the Cartridges being referred to are varied in their Brands/Models, so each Cartridge received back from the Third Party Service are more than likely a unique Model, such is my own.
Reporting on a Brand in such circumstances does not help others, due to the uniqueness of the Cartridge having undergone a Third Party Service.
I chose to report on the Comparison undertaken to the Original Model,
as it was done in Method that was quite accurate to carry out a comparison, but the known differences between the Models were not concealed.
The most important part of the report was that the method of purchasing a used Cartridge as a Donor and then using a Third Party Service, comes with a attached risk.
If a owned from New Cartridge is at a place of usage it could be improved upon by being serviced, I will suggest the Risk Factor seems to be a lesser concern for the Donor.
My experience being a outcome in my venture that was a workable one, and this will not be the outcome for all ventures.
I was letting a wider community know that I been supplied a Cartridge from a Third Party Service that was impressive and satisfying.
I think that is in keeping with the Thread.