Have any of you gentlemen used any of the top German made Dual direct drives in your projects ?. I understand Dual made a very good motor but please correct me if I'm wrong, Thank you
Vintage DD turntables. Are we living dangerously?
I have just acquired a 32 year old JVC/Victor TT-101 DD turntable after having its lesser brother, the TT-81 for the last year.
TT-101
This is one of the great DD designs made at a time when the giant Japanese electronics companies like Technics, Denon, JVC/Victor and Pioneer could pour millions of dollars into 'flagship' models to 'enhance' their lower range models which often sold in the millions.
Because of their complexity however.......if they malfunction.....parts are 'unobtanium'....and they often cannot be repaired.
TT-101
This is one of the great DD designs made at a time when the giant Japanese electronics companies like Technics, Denon, JVC/Victor and Pioneer could pour millions of dollars into 'flagship' models to 'enhance' their lower range models which often sold in the millions.
Because of their complexity however.......if they malfunction.....parts are 'unobtanium'....and they often cannot be repaired.
- ...
- 1793 posts total
Anyone use LUXMAN PD444 vintage direct drive turntable ??? How would you rate them against Technics Sp10mk2, those LUX decks goes for 2 grands sometimes. At least there is no need to change the plinth already made for two tonearms. Luxman pd-444 looks so nice that it's hard to resist. More info: HERE "Center of the spinning is the Load-Free Spindlestructure : by opposing two magnets inside the motor structure, the actual load applied to the bearing is lifted to a fifth of its normal value. The motor's name is MDS152C. Magnets aren't added but the motor itself is structured so as to do the above - no leaks or perturbations of the necessary magnetic flux. The platter is however maintained at large and heavy specifications to deal with 5Hz...10Hzfaster load variations.This system allows lightweight yet fully and inherently regulated moving parts. The chassis and feet mix materials to do away with resonances : two slabs of 3,2mm iron plates sandwiching a high-density chipboard for the base, neoprene rubber, springs, silicon grease,felt and iron rings for the high feet which are 10mm height-adjustable." |
Chakster, I can't answer your question directly, because I haven't heard the Technics, but I think I can contribute something meaningful. I have the little brother of the PD-444, the PD-441. I think it has the same motor as the PD-444, but holds only one tonearm, plinth correspondingly smaller. Mine is mounted with a Fidelity Research FR-64s tonearm with optional height adjuster and a Yamaha MC-1s cartridge, i.e, complete vintage 70's near state-of-the-art front end. Compared to my main rig, Acoustic Signature Final Tool, Kuzma 4-point, ZYX Universe, the Luxman is a little noisier, a little less resolving, bass not as good, but it has a drive that makes it eminently enjoyable, so much so that I could easily listen to it all the time. If you have any interest in the Luxman, I can't imagine being disappointed in it if it's set up properly. FWIW. Richard |
- 1793 posts total