actually I heard also very good MC
It's the 10k region to 100hz region that have the tendency to be bleached out, and noise vibration issue .. so unless we know what we are doing and take care of this . it generally won't sound better than MM. mm have worse speed. snap. extended sound. uninhibited and "detailed"
poorly executed Mc. bleached. lack of room and body. hifi sounding. digital. lack of harmonics.
in short good Mc can be very expensive to experiment. maybe my friend had spent over a million through 40 yrs of mc and still.... only somewhat accomplished
so that's our conclusion
the current mm setting way way more detailed overall if you add the middle frequency. 85 percent of slam and snap of Mc, but stage is way way huger, way better harmonic and insight . we all agree. its simply a more optimized setup
It's the 10k region to 100hz region that have the tendency to be bleached out, and noise vibration issue .. so unless we know what we are doing and take care of this . it generally won't sound better than MM. mm have worse speed. snap. extended sound. uninhibited and "detailed"
poorly executed Mc. bleached. lack of room and body. hifi sounding. digital. lack of harmonics.
in short good Mc can be very expensive to experiment. maybe my friend had spent over a million through 40 yrs of mc and still.... only somewhat accomplished
so that's our conclusion
the current mm setting way way more detailed overall if you add the middle frequency. 85 percent of slam and snap of Mc, but stage is way way huger, way better harmonic and insight . we all agree. its simply a more optimized setup