What is the best compressed iTunes format?


First, let me state that I fully understand that an uncompressed format is far superior to a compressed on such as MP3. My current iPod is a 4GB unit, but I just had the battery replaced on my wife's old 30GB unit and plan to transfer my music that direction.

I generally use it for listening at work on Sennheiser earbud headphones that retailed for about $80 new so we're not talking HiFi. My only iPod connection currently, or planned, to my main stereo is via an Onkyo dock so I'm not getting the benefit of an external DAC so again we're not talking HiFi.

Knowing that I have somewhat limited space, what would you recommend for me to choose as the format for iTunes. I've never done anything beyond one of the lower compression MP3 options, is there something better?

Please provide a suggestion and why.

Thanks
mceljo
Yes, I'm talking about a lossy format not WAV or Apple Lossless. I would assume that they both take up nearly the same amount of space?

Is there a lossy file type that is an Apple format? I'm assuming that the reason that the Apple Lossless is better than WAV is because the iPod DAC is better at the D/A on it.
I was just doing a little more research on the Apple Lossless format since I didn't realize that it reduced the file size so much compared to WAV.

Is this calculation correct?

30 GB = 30,000 MB / 652 MB (max per CD) = 45 CD (approx.)

If I assume that Apple Lossless is about 2/3 then the total goes up to 45 x 3/2 = 67 and the majority of CDs do not contain a full 652 MB so I should expect greater than 70 CDs to fit?
I think what I'm going to do is rip all of my audiophile CDs in Apple Lossless and the in the same MP3 format that I've previously ripped the rest of my CDs. I may need to upgrade the quality of a few CDs.
My two cents, rip everything lossless. Full stop. Eventually, you will come to regret it if you do not do it right the first time. Whether that is AIFF, WAV or Apple Lossless really dosn't matter -- they are all bit perfect and cross-convertible. Storage is super cheap, get them ripped and archived, and know you have them. As beteen lossless formats, don't know any real sonic difference personally, but AIFF or WAV is thought by some to be better, as both are bit perfect and uncompressed. Apple Lossless is in fact lossless, but compressed to about (I thought) 1/2 the size. I use AIFF, but not sure it's important.

Now, all that said, when you put them on a portable unit (ipad/pod/phone, etc), I always set the synching preferences to automatically convert to AAC (the compression/trimming ratio from AIFF to AAC is about 10:1). This way, you have the benefits of everything archived lossless, while your portable versions -- where the format just ain't going to get you that much of a differnce and putting a premium on quantity over quality makes sense at least to me -- convert automatically. Just to re-tweak the math, let's guess that 500 CDs would run you roughly 300gigs AIFF (think I actually have > 700 just north of 350gigs, but anyway). If you set it to automatically convert to AAC when synching, you can easily fit all 500 CDs on a 32gig ipod. Just saying....

Finally, you could rip things twice and essentially have two archived libriaries on disk someplace -- but it's a lot easier to rip lossless and then have a program do the converting for you. As you can go lossless to more compressed, but not the other way -- just make sure to start with lossless and you only need to rip once. Wether you ultimately keep sets of each or just convert on synching is up to you. (The only practical difference that I am aware of is that synching takes significantly longer if you are also simultaneously down-converting to AAC. 300 gigs could run you over 10 hours, so a good overnight task.) Just my two cents.