What makes a DAC so expensive?


You can buy a Cambridge Audio AXA25 25 Watt 2-Channel Integrated Stereo Amplifier | 3.5mm Input, USB Input for $225, and most DACs seem more costly. 

I'm wondering what it is that makes a Bifrost 2 almost as expensive as an Aegir and 3x's as expensive as the Cambridge product, above. I would have thought an Aegir would out-expense a Bifrost by a factor of two or three. What are the parts that make the difference? 

I'm wondering if the isolated DAC concept is one that comes with a "luxury" tax affixed. Can anyone explain what I'm getting in a Bifrost 2, or other similar product that justifies the expense...?

Thank you.
listening99
A:  My friend just died of a stroke

B:  But his body temp was exactly 98.6 - he was healthy

A:  He smoked like a chimney and ate bacon every meal

B:  But his blood pressure was exactly at the mid point of normal range for his age and weight

A:  Are you an idiot - he is dead

B:  I believe based on my measurements he is still alive

A:  Dumb ass

Power supply noise will show when THD+N is measured. There could be a lousy power supply which would be audible. All DACs will have noise from a power supply but do they effectively deal with it. If a DAC is audibly transparent , distortion and noise is below the threshold of human hearing, I'm not sure I understand the point. 
No audio equipment is 100% transparent to the human ear, not the recording studio equipment, and not the playback equipment.

I just bought the RME adi-2 FS DAC and it is awesome.   For me it checked all the boxes, great sound.... unbelievable feature set,  made in Germany,  full function remote, and most importantly at the price where I felt it made sense because let's face it, digital technology moves fast.  It easily bests my NAD M51 which is no slouch and was twice as much 7 years ago.   So for me this was the best bang for the buck.