what's the point?


https://web.archive.org/web/20190311201740/http://www.tom-morrow-land.com/tests/ampchall/index.htm
According to this, all amps that are played below clipping sound the same (indiscernible). So what benefit does it serve to purchase an expensive amplifier that may use more expensive capacitors or other parts?
Oh, and what pricepoint does the law of diminishing returns kick in for a class a/b amp/integrated rated at say 150 watts per Channel  @ 8 ohms capable of increasing power at 4 ohms and still being stable?  Thanks.
128x128labguy

Crusty, another point is: this forum is populated by people who have long ago moved beyond the question the op posed. Why take the word of some guy who wrote an article? The op not only wants an answer to the assertion made in the article he cites, he wants it provided to him by Audiogoners.

If you want to be an audiophile, you have to do the work yourself. Yes, drop a Crown (or chip amp, or any other) into your system, and listen for yourself. Whether or not any particular amp is acceptable is a matter of personal discrimination. No one can answer that question for the op, and the sooner he learns that, the better.

Though I didn't do it, also justifiable is questioning the notion of there being a pricepoint at which "the law of diminishing returns kicks in" (if only it were that simple). Talk about a subjective judgment!

and then drop in a Crown amp...and get very satisfying results?

No. Not at all.........
Actually, GK's system is So Passe'....

I finally got my shipment of DOD equipment I can't divulge the nature of.  I can 'infer' that it was used to stun opposing forces...got diverted from deployment @ Creamfields in the UK....
....but I've already said too much.....

stereo5....you're assuming MC sleeps......I suspect only when the lava lamp is on....
I think the OP's question is "too legit to quit", for sure.  Now whether he's asking it sincerely or just trolling...well, maybe only his "hairdresser knows for sure"!  (Wow, did I just date myself with that one!)  The article referenced is an oldie but it too, is legit.  It goes right along with the old STEREO REVIEW article from many moons ago comparing an inexpensive Pioneer stereo receiver to an expensive separate amplifier, conclusion being most folks could not hear a consistent difference.  Whichever side of the great divide you may recide, it is food for thought, now as then.
jdmccall56
The article referenced is an oldie but it too, is legit.
The article is just hearsay, with opinion and speculation ladled on top.