While I am on my soapbox, why are so many reviewers using obscure recordings to describe the sound? If I have never heard the recording how can I relate?Using the same recording over and over can be really boring. That's why there's a lot of music :) The point here is simply that the writer is using a recording that he thinks he knows well enough, and thinks its recorded well enough, that its worth mentioning how it sounds in the context of the review. The simple answer is 'you can't'. Just roll with it :)
What the heck do these terms mean?
I read a lot about audio equipment and some descriptions come up occasionally about the components sound qualities that to me are confusing. Most of the time I regard these descriptions as by someone with little knowledge about audio equipment that are trying to sound impressive.
Most of these terms are used in describing speakers but I have also seen them used on cables, amps , electronics of all sorts etc..
So, can someone help define these common descriptive terms?
1. Treble/ bass is dry- Huh? What does this mean?
2. Treble/bass is wet.- Huh? Again, what does this mean?
3. Organic sounding- Huh, huh?
4. Musical sounding.- What? Compared to non musical sounding?
The last one can be used with just about any description of any component or speaker performance.
There may be more...
ozzy
Most of these terms are used in describing speakers but I have also seen them used on cables, amps , electronics of all sorts etc..
So, can someone help define these common descriptive terms?
1. Treble/ bass is dry- Huh? What does this mean?
2. Treble/bass is wet.- Huh? Again, what does this mean?
3. Organic sounding- Huh, huh?
4. Musical sounding.- What? Compared to non musical sounding?
The last one can be used with just about any description of any component or speaker performance.
There may be more...
ozzy
- ...
- 60 posts total
For anyone, genuinely interested in audio terms, commonly used by reviewers, etc, here’s some reading from a few years back: https://www.stereophile.com/reference/50/index.html |
For anyone, genuinely interested in audio terms, commonly used by reviewers, etc, here’s some reading from a few years back: https://www.stereophile.com/reference/50/index.htmlThanks. That’s a really informative link. Interestingly "organic" was not used back in 1993 though 'naturalness' was, maybe they are similar. |
For audio descriptions/terminology, here's a Stereophile Glossary link: https://www.stereophile.com/reference/50/index.html +1 @ millercarbon - the book "Robert Harley’s The Complete Guide to High End Audio" is probably the best complete A to Z high-end audio book available written in easy to understand layman's terms. Robert Harley is Editor-In-Chief of The Absolute Sound magazine. If you're an audiophile interested in audio gear, I'm 95%+ confident that you'll like/love this book. |
- 60 posts total