When is the Apple Camera Adapter necessary?

I understand that the Apple Camera Adapter is necessary to connect an iOS device to a DAC with a USB-B input. (iOS —> camera adapter —> USB-A to USB-B cable—> DAC) But is the adapter necessary if the DAC has a USB-A input? For example, if I have a DAC that has an USB-A input, can I plug in an iOS device with the same lightning to USB cord that I use to charge it? (iOS —> Lightning to USB-A cord —> DAC) Or does the Camera Adapter do something to allow the DAC to extract the digital audio signal? I’ve looked on other websites such as iFi Audio and they are rather ambiguous about this subject. Thanks for the help!
My understanding is that the lightening charging cable won’t transmit data.  The camera adapter will bypass the iOS device’s internal DAC and just pass the unconverted digital signal that then can be sent to a USB DAC. 

I use the camera adapter into an Audioquest Dragonfly Red amp/DAC and realized a significant performance improvement with my headphones as opposed to plugging them directly into my iPad.  BTW, I also tried an aftermarket lightening camera adapter because it had the capability to charge my iPad as I’m listening to music, which the Apple adapter cannot do, and I found the Apple adapter to actually be a little more transparent.  So if sound quality is paramount I’d recommend paying up for the Apple camera adapter for critical listening with a quality headphone or audio system.

Hope this at least somewhat answers your question. 
My understanding is the camera adapter is just an ‘adapter’ and if your DAC or player accepts USB-A, you should be able to transmit content through this connection.
So I did some more digging and I found these pictures on the iFi website. Does this mean that the camera adapter is unnecessary for USB-A DACs, or is this just marketing?


I took a quick look and I think @kalali is correct in that the usb charging cable will transmit data with the main difference seeming to be that the charging cable has a male usb connector and the camera adapter has a female usb connector. There is a usb3 camera adapter that transfers data faster (usb 3.0 vs. 2.0) and has a lightning port too so you can charge your device or provide more power for equipment that needs it (microphones, etc.), but it is a little bulkier due to the added port. That’s all I got.
So now I’m confused again. The iFi website isn’t ambiguous, it’s contradictory. They have a picture of a iPhone connected to one of their DACs with a regular Lightning to male USB-A cable, but they also have this user manual: https://ifi-audio.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/nano_iDSD_BL_Manual.pdf (read the first bullet point). This is the only time that they have explicitly said that the regular charging cord won’t work. 

The only reasonable explanation I can think of is since they use the same USB port for charging, their "design" only supports USB3.0 protocol and the standard charging cable does not support USB3.0. I am not familiar with all the technical differences among the various USB standards but I am having difficulty understanding how the camera adapter could make a difference unless it somehow supports/converts to the higher USB protocol while converting/adapting from USB-A to USB-B connection.