Which DAC Filter - Fast or Slow?

John Atkinson typically does nice thorough measurements of reconstruction filter responses in Stereophile’s DAC reviews. Here is a link to a high end Gryphon player measurements, showing the differences in the various filters. 

https://www.stereophile.com/content/gryphon-ethos-cd-player-da-processor-measurements

In my understanding a “fast” filter has a very steep low pass transition. Sometimes called a “brick wall” filter with virtually zero signal above 22.05 kHz (for 44.1 kHz sample rate).  This allows less roll-off below 20 kHz. 

Impulse response is one of the characteristics of different filters. Typically a “fast” filter will have significant pre-ringing which might sound unnatural. 

On the good side a “fast” filter generally reduces the chances of aliased artifacts being artificially created above the Nyquist Frequency (22.05 kHz for redbook). 
 

In my experience, some DACs have obvious sonic differences between their filter choices. Some not so much. 

Much depends on your amplifiers Sonic signature as well as speakers if you have say a neutral highly detailed beryllium tweeter ,then the fast filter can be too much 

of a good thing . I had a bit ofthis issue , I used different sonic signature f fuses 

for-example the  Audiomagic M1 fuse has a bit more Bass and more depth of image ,I used this for the dac, then took 3 Synergistic purple fuses for back of amplifier and 2 purple fuses for the ,very good  Linear tube Audio LPS going to the Sonore Optical Deluxe converters  which was a big step up in resolution and balance ,a bit morethen I wanted to spend but brought my streaming up a few notches.

Everyone's hearing is different. Pink 'em. Slow for me.

So far seems more are for slow filters! Anyone for fast?  Aside for @baylinor and I get your point.

Use both, like both, big band, orchestra, rock, fast roll off, pop, small ensembles, vocal, jazz, slow roll off.