Which is more accurate: digital or vinyl?

As I have said before, I have yet to hear a consistent superiority of one format over the other.

Digital format is more likely to be consistent ( accurate?) from source to source rather than Analog. Each TT sounds different- mere change in settings. clamp force changes the sound drastically -questioning which one is truer.

Digital is but a sample of the sound.
Analog is the entire sound.

Out of curiosity, what was the analog set-up that you had to compare to the high dollar digital playback?

The analog setup was a re-tipped Grasshopper 2, mounted on a Triplanar arm which was in turn on a Kuzma Stabi Reference. The arm was set up with a balanced connection driving the balanced phono section of the Atma-Sphere MP-1 preamp.

The difference between that and the Staltek system (easily the best digital I have heard so far, regardless of the digital source file) was readily audible as an increased smoothness and level of detail on the part of the LP. For the most part ticks and pops did not give away the vinyl either; if things are set up correctly the vinyl rig will not enhance ticks and pops (although it is my opinion that so many rigs do have troubles with this; thus one important reason that digital has done as well as it has).

Analog might(?) be the entire sound, and then some. That entire sound is often masked by extraneous noise.