Who is using passive preamps and why?


Seldom has there been any discussions on passive preamps in the forums and although my experience with them has been limited I have found them so far to be very enjoyable and refreshingly different. They seem to fall into their own category, somewhere between solid state and tube. Finding a preamp that is satisfing has been difficult. Some active solid state preamps can be very good but they seem to inject grain to some degree in the upper registers and some tube preamps are not too far behind. So far I think they should at least be matched up with an amp that has sufficient gain which is often overlooked. Which passives are you using and with what amp? Why do you like them?
phd

Showing 1 response by palasr

Clio09,

I think there is something to the perceived soundstage depth argument postulated by your sound engineer friend. Much like finding the "correct" volume for any given recording, I often find myself shifting my chair slightly forward or back (maybe 3-4" either way) to find the correct listening perspective for any particular recording where center images snap into focus, and the soundstage expands nicely in all three axes. Given the wide array of monitoring positions and speaker locations used by mixing engineers while twiddling the pan pots, it would seem logical that reproducing any perspective of depth and width would vary based upon these unknowable factors (not that stereo isn't a complete contrivance anyway). While I don't agree with shoving speakers against a wall unless they're designed for it, the discussion is an interesting one.