Who is using passive preamps and why?


Seldom has there been any discussions on passive preamps in the forums and although my experience with them has been limited I have found them so far to be very enjoyable and refreshingly different. They seem to fall into their own category, somewhere between solid state and tube. Finding a preamp that is satisfing has been difficult. Some active solid state preamps can be very good but they seem to inject grain to some degree in the upper registers and some tube preamps are not too far behind. So far I think they should at least be matched up with an amp that has sufficient gain which is often overlooked. Which passives are you using and with what amp? Why do you like them?
phd
That is very true, for some no active beats a passive in their system. So to answer the original question, many use them becasue they are a very viable opton to SOTA sound, though some still prefer actives for their own reasons, and it not a right or wrong difference, just two approaches and choices.
Oh, kumbaya.

C'mon... Actives are better than passives. Tubes rule, transistors drool...

This passive argument has become far too passive. Where's the entertainment?
A more active argument would be a thread on whether anyone can actually hear ANY difference between power cords of the same guage.......
Ngjockey, not everyone who owns a passive is passive. I live an exciting life. After slopping the hogs I return to my listening room where I quickly fall asleep enjoying my passive preamp. My corn field don't care what kind of preamp I buy!

Don't believe it.
I have a P-L-P (pathetic little preamp) which is a 25k TDK motorized pot. At the risk of being called tin ears, or worse, my Adcom GFP-750 could switch between active and passive and the differences were virtually inaudible. Maybe becasue I listen at 60-70dB.
Active a tiny bit more dynamic, passive a tiny bit clearer/ less grainy.