Why did you choose a horn based loudspeaker?

"Plus I find a horn loudspeakers to be interesting in design and in appearance."

Probably the main reason I would.

Full range high efficiency horns also tend to be relatively large though, which is their biggest barrier for most these days where space is often at a premium and other more compact good performing and readily available options exist as well I suspect.

I believe I can achieve similarly great if not exactly identical results with or without horns though. It's more about how one mixes the soup than any one particular ingredient, I have found.

I've never had a proper set of horn loudspeakers, but I've always wanted to. Back in the old days, I had friends and acquaintences that had VOTT or Klipschorns, and I always enjoyed hearing them.

I was introduced to Tannoys late 60's, and used them until late the 80's. After years with B&W and Dynaudio, I have gone back to Tannoy, so I could more readily use tubes and SET's.

This is the best I've had to date, Tannoy HPD 315's with an SET 300B amp. This has positioned me to be able to use a full-blown horn system, which I'd still like to try, but the HPD's are working exceptioally well for me.

My large listening room would be great with horns, but the Tannoys have a grip on my heart that may not go away.

Nice thread, enjoy and regards,
Dan

I did NOT choose horns. They all sounded unrealistic to me untill I heard Avangard ones at dealer each in separate room. Uno and Duo are hybrid horn with dynamic subwoofer and Trio is all horn. Fast and open sound with close to studio-mastering precision and clarity. Their looks are also subject for the exitement. Taken all so much of positives, nevertheless, I got tired of listening after 15...20min. During next couple of hours after listening I had ringing sound in my ears.
Obviously horns are easy to drive with low-powered tube amp and by all audiophile standards these are the most transparent and pure.