Why isn’t more detail always better?


Is more detail always better if not unnaturally bright or fatiguing?

128x128mapman
Post removed 

What is being said at exactly 4:41? This was asked on another forum and no one could answer until I did, at which point many agreed.

Does your system have the detail so that you can understand this? wink

https://youtu.be/_dbYxAr697w

Hello,
I don't understand the question, actually. You ask if more detail would be less good?
But then there's the music, period. A system can be transparent, allowing the sound to appear as it should. If it doesn't sound good, it's not due to the "details" you hear better, but to the room you're listening to, and the materials you've chosen. 
The choice of recording quality is also very important. But a system that's transparent in the sense that it's balanced can't be bad.

@mapman

"Bloom" is something mostly heard in live music, and rarely in reproduced (recorded) music (and the systems most of us have).

It is when the harmonics (overtones) of an instrument (or an orchestra) spread outwards in space, the way it does Live in a symphony hall (but not in a rock concert, which is about brute force). In most systems, "bloom" is the least likely trait to be achieved, as that is typically seen in very expensive systems. My WATTs - none of the generations I had - were not the type of speaker to produce "bloom." The WATT, in its first four generations, had much more of the "direct" sound, which is what Dave Wilson was aiming for when he recorded. Most of his recordings were violin/piano very close to the microphone, so there is not much bloom there. My Avalons and Infinity  speakers did do that. It is not related to attack or decay. Think of it as a kind of "echo" in that it goes on for seconds after a string is plucked, or percussion hit (assuming they don't silence the instrument manually). But the main point is that pop/rock music rarely ever have bloom. That is the purview of classical/jazz/international music,  and even THEY must be VERY well recorded.

 

Hmm I have ohm Walsh speakers that are very wide dispersion/pseudo Omni…somewhat like mbl.

I never thought about it that way but sounds like they are good candidates to produce “bloom” as described.

 

I do always regard the ohm Walsh sound to be more like live music than most. That is their most unique sonic trait and why I always seem to levitate towards them.