Dear Thekong: +++++ " So, that goes back to what I like / prefer ... " +++++
not exactly, maybe I did not make a good explanation or you don't read it pefectly what I posted because your statement is not what we are looking for. We don't want more of the same because in some ways more of the same were wrong.
What we like it what you like or what I like or prefer is not the main subject but what is right or wrong, it does not matters if we like it or not.
When you attend to listen music ( example a horn player ) maybe you could like what you hear or not but that does not cares to any one.
What you are listening ( I'm not talking here: the kind of music but the instrument sound. ) is the way the instrument " speaks ", it's the self instrument color/voice and you can't do nothing to change it. The player does not ask you if you like it that instrument " voice ", he just play.
Maybe you could like more that hron sound if been less agressive or more smooth or not so bright or with more lush. All these because it's that way you are accustom to for all your audio life is that way that your " ears " prefer the music sound but what you normally are accustom to maybe is not right but wrong maybe it's not the sound of music in a live event at near field listening position.
So, what you like mor prefer is not important. What we are doing is wuestioning if what we heard through each one system is right or wrong against live music.
I posted here:
" if we have to grow up and the first change must be in each one unbiased attitude " +++++
" ++++ along attend as many times you can to hear live music. " ++++
that means no more: " I like or I prefer ", because the main subject has nothing to do with what we prefer because what we prefer is subjective ( and could be way wrong ) and how in true a horn " speaks " is objective: like it or not.
The example is with a horn but is valid with each instrument or at orchestra levels.
With all respect I don't care what you like/prefer or do not or if you want to change it all that's up to you
. I'm only sharing a " road "/alternative to improve each one audio system enjoyment and that's all.
IMHO something that could help to each one of us is how each one of us can enrich the whole subject/idea/alternative more than question it because we can't question it something that we never have the opportunity to experience.
I think is futile/useless to question/argue against something that we are not willing to do/try.
Everyone of us think that we already achieved the audio Nirvana at home and that could be not exactly as that because: do you think that exist thousands kind of Nirvana's?
IMHO exist only one, the right one. I'm still on the quest of it.
Regards and enjoy the music,
R.
not exactly, maybe I did not make a good explanation or you don't read it pefectly what I posted because your statement is not what we are looking for. We don't want more of the same because in some ways more of the same were wrong.
What we like it what you like or what I like or prefer is not the main subject but what is right or wrong, it does not matters if we like it or not.
When you attend to listen music ( example a horn player ) maybe you could like what you hear or not but that does not cares to any one.
What you are listening ( I'm not talking here: the kind of music but the instrument sound. ) is the way the instrument " speaks ", it's the self instrument color/voice and you can't do nothing to change it. The player does not ask you if you like it that instrument " voice ", he just play.
Maybe you could like more that hron sound if been less agressive or more smooth or not so bright or with more lush. All these because it's that way you are accustom to for all your audio life is that way that your " ears " prefer the music sound but what you normally are accustom to maybe is not right but wrong maybe it's not the sound of music in a live event at near field listening position.
So, what you like mor prefer is not important. What we are doing is wuestioning if what we heard through each one system is right or wrong against live music.
I posted here:
" if we have to grow up and the first change must be in each one unbiased attitude " +++++
" ++++ along attend as many times you can to hear live music. " ++++
that means no more: " I like or I prefer ", because the main subject has nothing to do with what we prefer because what we prefer is subjective ( and could be way wrong ) and how in true a horn " speaks " is objective: like it or not.
The example is with a horn but is valid with each instrument or at orchestra levels.
With all respect I don't care what you like/prefer or do not or if you want to change it all that's up to you
. I'm only sharing a " road "/alternative to improve each one audio system enjoyment and that's all.
IMHO something that could help to each one of us is how each one of us can enrich the whole subject/idea/alternative more than question it because we can't question it something that we never have the opportunity to experience.
I think is futile/useless to question/argue against something that we are not willing to do/try.
Everyone of us think that we already achieved the audio Nirvana at home and that could be not exactly as that because: do you think that exist thousands kind of Nirvana's?
IMHO exist only one, the right one. I'm still on the quest of it.
Regards and enjoy the music,
R.