Eminent Technology ET-2 Tonearm Owners

Hi Thekong

Yes please post a pic of your ET2.5 with the modified counterweight when you can; would love to see it and look forward to your ET 2.5 impressions as well. I have had my ET2 on the left side of a table. I found it very awkward both from a handling and viewing (the cantilever) perspective.

Then again I don’t get driving on the left side of the road either.....

I am curious about the Rockport and Kuzma based on what Ketchup and yourself said regarding the tubing.

Ketchup
What about that stiff plastic tubing on the Kuzma? It seems like it would have a huge effect on the arm's movement even if both of the fittings swiveled.

Thekong
I can’t say they have no effect on movement, but they certainly don’t hinder it, at least not to the point of causing mistracking.

Based on my ET2 experiences, the arm can be lined up properly and if the pump is decent it will track fine. But nowhere near its potential if the wiring is affecting its travel. So would not the best air bearing design/solution mean no wire(if it was possible) and tubing attached to the moving pieces, giving the cartridge/armtube the greatest freedom ? I'm just sayin' as a user.

The Rockport and Kuzma tubing makes me think of my past experiences with my VPI JMW 12 tonearm. That tonearm’s wires are used as its antiskating method. Their positioning pushes the tonearm back toward the outside.

Could the tubing being in a loop at the centre of the Rockport and Kuzma arm, be acting as a type of dampener for the arms motion in both directions ?

Cheers

Could the tubing being in a loop at the centre of the Rockport and Kuzma arm, be acting as a type of dampener for the arms motion in both directions ?

Hi Ct,

I think the tubing is just a necessary evil in the Rockport / Kuzma design. As for whether it affects the tracking, when I adjusted the arm to free floating (i.e. 0 VTF), I can put the arm in any position without it going in or out. So, I suppose the affect is minimal.

However, there is one interesting point that I still can’t understand. When moving the arm in and out by hand, the feeling of the ET is smoother (or I should say requires less force) than the Rockport! While I don't have the spec. of the 2 bearings, I have always assumed that the Rockport has a tighter tolerance / air gap. This can be shown when trying to move the arms without the air supply. While you can still move the ET quite easily, a lot more force is required for the Rockport in this condition.

But, when air pressure is supplied, shouldn't both of them be virtually frictionless? I think if the Rockport indeed has friction, the cartridge would probably mistrack. Or could it be the horizontal mass that we have been talking about? Based only on the look, if the horizontal mass of the Airline is 100g, I would estimate the Rockport is about half to 1/3 of that, so in the 35-50g range, not that far away from that of the ET!

Thekong.

Thanks for posting the photo of the counterweight arm. One suggestion is that you need to be very carefull with the stiffness of this. Any shake rattle and roll here is bad since it is no longer free to pivot about the leaf spring. I experimneted with the rod carrying the weight and finished up with an aluminium rod with a M10 thread for adjustment. Smaller diameters were quite flexable.

Hi Richard,

Thank you for the suggestion!

As this is only for experimenting, it is a bit rough. Would certainly take your suggestion into consideration if I decide I like this arrangement and fabricate the final counterweight assembly!