Most of the comments that precede this have be quite informative.
1. The economics of the industry are adverse to growth. I will attend the RMAF next month and hopefully meet many of you reading this thread. When I see staggering cost of most of the components being sold today, there is no doubt that my hobby has lost touch with the audio enthusiast. The typical pair of monoblock amps start at 20K and the average pair of speakers are about the same. The price/value of the gear has absurdly decreased. The smaller pool of buyers have forced manufacturers to increase pricing to stay in business. This is a business model destined for failure.
2. The internet has changed the audio landscape forever.
It would be hard to avoid the fact that Audiogon (or websites like it) have taken advantage of the technology. This has made life more difficult for retailers. It is amazing to me that virtually (pun intended) all the audio equipment purchases that I have made since finding this website have been internet based. I have made the decision that it is better to make a mistake from a sonic perspective on an internet based purchase and have a ready market of buyers for that same item lined-up on the website. Many have come to the same conclusion. Many (not all!)of the home based dealers are audio enthusiasts who want to buy equipment at wholesale for themselves and their friends. There are obviously many notable exceptions but many home based dealers are enthusiasts clothed as dealers.
The problem with all of this is that without real dealers the industry will have trouble attracting new flesh to the hobby.
3. The audio magazines have also played a part in this shift. Becoming an organ of their advertisers, these magazines have lost credibility with their readership. I am much more likely to consider the opinion of a known Audiogon member than the magazines. This again shifts me to the internet as a clearinghouse of information. The magazines as well as the industry have lost relevance except on Acura car commercials.
4. Chinese gear has shown us how poor the price/value of the gear we buy. I don't want to get into a political debate especially when many known companies have shifted at least a portion of their manufacturing overseas.
5. Are the components today really much better than those of the 80's and 90's? They are certainly different but are they more satisfying? To me this is one of the major points of discussion. Audio for the most part is a quite mature industry. I have not really seen any major break-through that has made me want to run out and buy newer equipment. The Ipod was certainly a watershed for portable music. I have not seen anything in audio nearly as significant. When I went to my first RMAF 3 years ago, I bought my first $150 GPS to get around. My thought during the entire show was that this GPS was far more interesting than anything that I saw at the show (yet I am going again!) We are dusting off analog turntables and reel to reel machines from 30 years ago because of the incredible sonics of these relics.
5. Ipod, economy. The posts above handled these topics.
1. The economics of the industry are adverse to growth. I will attend the RMAF next month and hopefully meet many of you reading this thread. When I see staggering cost of most of the components being sold today, there is no doubt that my hobby has lost touch with the audio enthusiast. The typical pair of monoblock amps start at 20K and the average pair of speakers are about the same. The price/value of the gear has absurdly decreased. The smaller pool of buyers have forced manufacturers to increase pricing to stay in business. This is a business model destined for failure.
2. The internet has changed the audio landscape forever.
It would be hard to avoid the fact that Audiogon (or websites like it) have taken advantage of the technology. This has made life more difficult for retailers. It is amazing to me that virtually (pun intended) all the audio equipment purchases that I have made since finding this website have been internet based. I have made the decision that it is better to make a mistake from a sonic perspective on an internet based purchase and have a ready market of buyers for that same item lined-up on the website. Many have come to the same conclusion. Many (not all!)of the home based dealers are audio enthusiasts who want to buy equipment at wholesale for themselves and their friends. There are obviously many notable exceptions but many home based dealers are enthusiasts clothed as dealers.
The problem with all of this is that without real dealers the industry will have trouble attracting new flesh to the hobby.
3. The audio magazines have also played a part in this shift. Becoming an organ of their advertisers, these magazines have lost credibility with their readership. I am much more likely to consider the opinion of a known Audiogon member than the magazines. This again shifts me to the internet as a clearinghouse of information. The magazines as well as the industry have lost relevance except on Acura car commercials.
4. Chinese gear has shown us how poor the price/value of the gear we buy. I don't want to get into a political debate especially when many known companies have shifted at least a portion of their manufacturing overseas.
5. Are the components today really much better than those of the 80's and 90's? They are certainly different but are they more satisfying? To me this is one of the major points of discussion. Audio for the most part is a quite mature industry. I have not really seen any major break-through that has made me want to run out and buy newer equipment. The Ipod was certainly a watershed for portable music. I have not seen anything in audio nearly as significant. When I went to my first RMAF 3 years ago, I bought my first $150 GPS to get around. My thought during the entire show was that this GPS was far more interesting than anything that I saw at the show (yet I am going again!) We are dusting off analog turntables and reel to reel machines from 30 years ago because of the incredible sonics of these relics.
5. Ipod, economy. The posts above handled these topics.