One thing I wish Tony would do is go through his ratings and knock the numbers down. If a Duelund VSF is a 12.5 (out of 10) it gives the impression of stuff being to high. Make the Duelund (or whatever the reference is) a 10 and then put the Mundorf Supreme down to 6.5 and the Solens at 4. That would reflect more reality. That would say most factory speakers use a 3 or 4 (out of 10) part and a upgrade to to Supreme would be a upgrade to a pass from a failure. Right now it looks like everything above 10 out of 10 is gravy! (or something crazy)
The numbers he uses make it look like most are really, really good and some (like Duelund) are just stupid good (like 12.5/10) and I disagree with that. Undertow talked about dimishing returns and stuff like Tony's review make it seem that way, because if 10 is perfect why get 12???
The numbers he uses make it look like most are really, really good and some (like Duelund) are just stupid good (like 12.5/10) and I disagree with that. Undertow talked about dimishing returns and stuff like Tony's review make it seem that way, because if 10 is perfect why get 12???