The Duelund tweeter inductor is installed.
The construction is of course very close to the vintage that was there. Both are wire wrapped around cardboard. coated in wax. The vintage is solid wire and very thin guage. The Duelund is of course foil wire and heavier guage.
The Duelund is MUCH bigger and heavier and better built. The vintage is not as tight with the wax maybe allowing some resonance? I bet the vintage though is still better than most any inductor built today as at least it is wax paper. (some way to deal with resonance)
The initial sound impression is the Duelund sounds hotter. The lower DCR? (not sure) I was thinking it would be quieter (because of better resonance control) more laid back and was not sure I wanted to go that way. It is the opposite meaning more signal to the tweeter.
This may make sense as the Duelund solid wire (used internally) cut the high freq and did not sound quite right. (to me)
This is a parallel tweeter inductor and my initial thought is these parts did not matter so much, yet the sound is very different! Not sure yet what is all means but for sure very different. So these parts DO make a difference. It sounds like more signal getting through which is what the woofer inductor change sounded like.
Was the thin vintage wire cutting back the signal? (I think so)
I was up buying connectors from the local stereo store for this job and I can not believe how far my system sounds compared to store. $10k systems sound literally like clock radios.