The ML 23, although I have not heard it. I have heard an ML 27 and it had the same character as the 20.0 (actually maybe even slightly darker). I expect that the whole 20 series would have this similar character, but can't be 100% sure. As to the word "dark", there is a thread about the audiophile lingo. The link is: http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?htech&1024685609
As to what is dark, well I suppose it's the opposite of bright. Bright generally has a lot of high end information and with that frequently comes grain or harshness. It frequently has the "in your face" kind of presentation. Dark does not have that character, it's laid back, free from grain, but does not have the immediacy that something "bright" would. Dark can be a real detriment in some systems, but in others where the speakers might lean towards the bright side, it would likely work very well--at least that's what I found in my system. What speakers are you planning to bi-amp? Have you selected a crossover?
As to what is dark, well I suppose it's the opposite of bright. Bright generally has a lot of high end information and with that frequently comes grain or harshness. It frequently has the "in your face" kind of presentation. Dark does not have that character, it's laid back, free from grain, but does not have the immediacy that something "bright" would. Dark can be a real detriment in some systems, but in others where the speakers might lean towards the bright side, it would likely work very well--at least that's what I found in my system. What speakers are you planning to bi-amp? Have you selected a crossover?