Reference DACS: An overall perspective


There has been many threads the last few months regarding the sonic signature of some of the highest regarded reference DACS (Dcs,Meitner,Ensemble,Audio Note,Zanden,Reimyo,Accustic Arts) here on the GON. I have been very fortunate to audtion many of these wonderful pieces in my home or friend's systems. I wanted to share, in a systematic way, my impressions/opinions with you GON members for a two reasons: 1)That my experiences might be helpful to fellow members interested in audtioning these DACS. 2)Starting an interesting discussion regarding the different "sonic flavors" of these reference digital front ends. I totally agree with the statement, "if you have not heard it you don't have an opinion". Therefore, I have no comments regarding DACS from Weiss,Goldmund,Audio Aero and Burmester because I have never had the pleasure of audtioning them. I would love to hear from members who have and share their experiences with us. My overall impression is that these DACS(Dcs,Meitner,Ensemble,Audio Note,Zanden,Reimyo,Accustic Arts) can be grouped into two molar categories regarding their overall sonic signature. By the way, all of them can throw a large/deep soundstage with excellent layering in the acoustic space with "air" around individual players on that stage. However, than they start to part company into two major categories. Category #1) These DACS "flavors" revolve around pristine clarity, fine sharp details,speed,very extended top/bottom frequencies,and great PRAT. These DACS never sound "etched" or "in your face" but are more "upfront" then "layed back" in their presentation. The DACS, to my ear's, that go into this bracket are Dcs,Ensemble,Meitner. My personnal favorite in this group is the Ensemble, which I owned for two years. These DACS remind me of the sonic signature of speakers such as Wilson,Thiel,Dynaudio, Focal/JM Labs. Category #2) These DACS "flavors" revolve around a "musical/organic" sense, natural timbres,and an easy flowing liquidity. Their "less forward" presentation my give the impression of less detail, but I think in this case its an illusion fostered by their more relaxed/organic manner. The DACS, to my ear's, that go into this bracket are Audio Note,Zanden,Reimyo,Accustic Arts. I did find that the tube DACS did not have the top/bottom frequency extenstion and PRAT of the SS DACS in this bracket. For me, the Accustic Arts DAC1-MK3 gave me the best of both categories, therefore it is now the resident DAC in my system. These DACS remind me of the sonic signature of speakers such as Magnepan,Von Schweikert,Sonus Faber. Well, it's all just my opinion regarding these digital pieces, but I hope this post was at least informative/somewhat interesting and would lend itself to other GON members sharing their impressions, not about what DAC is the "BEST" in the world, but your personnal taste and synergy with your system.
teajay
Al,
New Esoteric X-01 D2 could be revolutionary player! Big difference is that it is using DUAL(!!) DACs for PCM and DSD. PCM1704 is used for CD playback and AD1955 is used for DSD(both in balaced configuration). But, you can also upsample PCM to DSD or DSD to PCM as well. There are 3 types of DSD modes also. New X-01 D2 is using further updated VRDS-NEO transport and is pretty much very complex machine. Release in Japan in December, USA Januar 2007 and EU March 2007.
BTW, also new is EMMLabs CDSA CD/SACD player without preamp function.
Branimir,
since my MephistoII still holds very well and outperformed the X03, I think March '07 is a good reason to wait! (EU)
I did a google search for Esoteric X01 D2 and found the following info (translated from japenese)
Price is 1,417,500 Yen = $ 12,000
4th generation VRDS NEO using ceramic ball bearings
Dual DACs using PCM 1704 and AD 1955.
3 "mode" types : DSD mode = SACD
Multiple bit mode = PCM using 1704's
1 bit mode PCM using AD 1955's
Also "reference" mode. Automatically changes mode
"depending on source"
Better channel seperation
Higher signal to noise ratio
Incorporates Xo1 ltd features ( wire,signal path
upgrades,next gen's etc.)
Sorry if some of this doesn't make sense but it gets a little murky in the translation. - Jim