Reference DACS: An overall perspective


There has been many threads the last few months regarding the sonic signature of some of the highest regarded reference DACS (Dcs,Meitner,Ensemble,Audio Note,Zanden,Reimyo,Accustic Arts) here on the GON. I have been very fortunate to audtion many of these wonderful pieces in my home or friend's systems. I wanted to share, in a systematic way, my impressions/opinions with you GON members for a two reasons: 1)That my experiences might be helpful to fellow members interested in audtioning these DACS. 2)Starting an interesting discussion regarding the different "sonic flavors" of these reference digital front ends. I totally agree with the statement, "if you have not heard it you don't have an opinion". Therefore, I have no comments regarding DACS from Weiss,Goldmund,Audio Aero and Burmester because I have never had the pleasure of audtioning them. I would love to hear from members who have and share their experiences with us. My overall impression is that these DACS(Dcs,Meitner,Ensemble,Audio Note,Zanden,Reimyo,Accustic Arts) can be grouped into two molar categories regarding their overall sonic signature. By the way, all of them can throw a large/deep soundstage with excellent layering in the acoustic space with "air" around individual players on that stage. However, than they start to part company into two major categories. Category #1) These DACS "flavors" revolve around pristine clarity, fine sharp details,speed,very extended top/bottom frequencies,and great PRAT. These DACS never sound "etched" or "in your face" but are more "upfront" then "layed back" in their presentation. The DACS, to my ear's, that go into this bracket are Dcs,Ensemble,Meitner. My personnal favorite in this group is the Ensemble, which I owned for two years. These DACS remind me of the sonic signature of speakers such as Wilson,Thiel,Dynaudio, Focal/JM Labs. Category #2) These DACS "flavors" revolve around a "musical/organic" sense, natural timbres,and an easy flowing liquidity. Their "less forward" presentation my give the impression of less detail, but I think in this case its an illusion fostered by their more relaxed/organic manner. The DACS, to my ear's, that go into this bracket are Audio Note,Zanden,Reimyo,Accustic Arts. I did find that the tube DACS did not have the top/bottom frequency extenstion and PRAT of the SS DACS in this bracket. For me, the Accustic Arts DAC1-MK3 gave me the best of both categories, therefore it is now the resident DAC in my system. These DACS remind me of the sonic signature of speakers such as Magnepan,Von Schweikert,Sonus Faber. Well, it's all just my opinion regarding these digital pieces, but I hope this post was at least informative/somewhat interesting and would lend itself to other GON members sharing their impressions, not about what DAC is the "BEST" in the world, but your personnal taste and synergy with your system.
teajay
I have the Accustic Arts Drive 1 MK2 and the Dac1 MK4. They are connected to a BAT VK51SE preamp and Krell 650mono blocks. The speakers are JM LAB Focal Utopias. I can honestly say that with fair to excellant recordings it is VERY musical! I am glad to have discovered the AA digital front end.
This thread some very experienced listeners and some owners of some of the finest DAC made, I wonder as DAC evolved and we move forward do you see music servers in your immediate future? Is USB connection essential to your next DAC purchase. I feel I am sticking with what I have for a long while (a CD player) as it seems the computer-based future has a long way to go before it is ready for prime time.
Pupil57, there seems to be now a clear trend toward flexible front end devices that supply both digital inputs and outputs.... Example is the Esoteric K-01 and K-03 I believe. Furthermore, manufacturers that have traditionally stayed out of the front end arena because of sheer distrust of moving parts, are starting to introduce DAC-only products... see for example the $10K Rowland Aeris shown at CES, fed by Mac minis with Amara.

Considering that I have historically kept my front end players for 5 to 10 years each, I venture to suspect that my next front end will be flexible enough to accomodate a server-based transport. Whether the connection between transport and DAC will be USB, HDMI, Wi-Fi, Ethernet, Light Peak, or other.... is still undetermined.
Do you believe the move to computer-based storage is being caused by real improvements in sound quality, as an improved "transport" vehicle, or simply convenience? I'm not sure I wold go through the trouble of loading my 3,000 on to a hard drive of some kind, unless it was sonic step forward, I don't find it that inconvenient to pull out a CD and putting it in my player.
Less Loss is a pure stream, so is claimed. Unfortunately, the resulting data has to a go through an interface before the DAC. True? Right now, the info gleaned by my super faithful transport feeds the DAC directly.