Greg: I should have clarified that my "NO" feedback was in regards to "global" feedback. The use of small amounts of local feedback is not a big deal and results in less time lag. Sorry for my lack of clarification.
Tom: That was a good find. I'm sure that Theta won't mind the re-post here either : )
Marakanetz: I agree with your basic statements. See my response above to Greg.
El: My analogy applies more to "global feedback" than to "local feedback". Distortion and the correction of that distortion is like gossip. It can be quelled much faster and in a more effective manner "locally" than it can when trying to fix the problem "globally".
Think of "local feedback" as having a dedicated supervisor for each stage of amplification. If everything is good in section A, B & C but section D is a mess, only section D's supervisor has to get involved.
On the other hand, global feedback is kind of like having one supervisor by himself trying to keep track of what is going on in the entire "plant". The potential for more problems to slip through the cracks un-noticed is far greater. Once those problems are noticed, it is possible that the amount and type of correction applied may not be directly to the source of the problem, resulting in other problems. This is why global feedback is less desirable. Sean
>
Tom: That was a good find. I'm sure that Theta won't mind the re-post here either : )
Marakanetz: I agree with your basic statements. See my response above to Greg.
El: My analogy applies more to "global feedback" than to "local feedback". Distortion and the correction of that distortion is like gossip. It can be quelled much faster and in a more effective manner "locally" than it can when trying to fix the problem "globally".
Think of "local feedback" as having a dedicated supervisor for each stage of amplification. If everything is good in section A, B & C but section D is a mess, only section D's supervisor has to get involved.
On the other hand, global feedback is kind of like having one supervisor by himself trying to keep track of what is going on in the entire "plant". The potential for more problems to slip through the cracks un-noticed is far greater. Once those problems are noticed, it is possible that the amount and type of correction applied may not be directly to the source of the problem, resulting in other problems. This is why global feedback is less desirable. Sean
>