Is DEQX a game changer?

Got is Al. So, at this point, have you completed your empirical assessment of the DEQX's D/A and A/D "pass-through" transparency??

Al ... as I have already posted a couple of times, a respected dealer once told me that sometimes you have to take 2 steps back to go 5 steps forward. My point is simply that empirical observations re the DEQX's touted transparency aside, ... it's still an artifact.

This may come off as a contradiction, but I believe the DEQX does something to the signal integrity on top of what it's supposed to do. Frankly, if I had my druthers, I wouldn't use it. But with my speakers, in my room, the DEQX adds a lot more than it takes. Life is about compromises.

Regards and please keep us posted about your progress.

Bruce

P.S. -- Al ... You may have caught the thread about the Ref 150 SE upgrade. ARC upgraded the circuits in my Ref 150 to better accommodate the KT-150 tubes. Wasn't cheap, but I think there's a significant improvement in SQ. The upgrade is still in break-in mode, so I hope to hear some continued improvements.

Hi Bruce,

Yes, I've been following the ARC KT-150 upgrade threads to some extent, particularly including your posts. Glad it appears to be working out well.

And yes, at this point I'm satisfied with the transparency of the DEQX, and I'm ready to move on to the measurement and calibration/correction processes. As I indicated, though, progress may be a bit slow in the coming weeks, due to other activities. Also, before moving the speakers to the center of the room for the measurements (outdoors measurement being a non-starter in my case, as it was in yours), I'm planning to first dry run the entire process with the speakers in their normal position. That way I won't risk moving the speakers to the center of the room and then back, finding that I've screwed up or at least not done things optimally, and then having to move them again. Even though the bases and footers I have the speakers on only raise them a bit less than 5 inches above the floor, I don't relish lifting/sliding their 108 pound weight off of those bases, and subsequently raising and maneuvering them back on.

Best,
-- Al

Bifwynne, could you describe this artifact?

I'd like to know about the artifact as well. Before relying on the DEQX as the 'brain' of my system, I needed to convince myself that it was virtually transparent in bypass mode. In bypass, the room and speaker corrections are left out, but the A/D and D/A conversions are performed by the DEQX. I compared my setup with and without the DEQX, keeping my analog preamp in the loop for both. I was unable to hear any sonic degradation being introduced by the DEQX. This is amazing to me.

Al,

Thanks for your report on your experiences with the HDP-5. I like your step-by-step approach of evaluating the bypass mode in comparision to your previous set-up. I look forward to hearing what differences you hear in bypass mode once you have had a chance to listen and compare for a longer stretch.