ARC Ref 2 MK 2 Pre w/ Pass X-600 monos?


Has anyone tried this combination before or can anyone comment whether this would be a good match in terms of impedance matching and overall sonic performance.

I currently have the x-600 matched with the Aesthetix Calypso and together they drive the Talon Khorus MK II. I like the overall sound but I find the low end rather anemic given the potential of these speakers. In addition, I have replaced the tubes 3 times in 4 months beacuse I keep getting a poppping and hissing noise in one of the channels. Changing the tubes corrects this, but I am ready to cut bait and move on to something else. Would appreciate any recommendations!

Many thanks and regards...
msaines
Doesn't make sense. The ARC, if anything, provides an extra boost to the bottom end.
I second the LS5 mkll. I never put mine up against the Ref 2 but, I did almost make the mistake of switching it for the Ref 1. Thank goodness I auditioned the Ref 1 for a week first. The balanced only inputs are a minor annoyance but, Cardas adapters take care of that.
I have had my Calypso for 3 months and it has performed flawlessly. I have never replaced any tubes nor do I feel the need to do any tube rolling.
I have ARC REF2 (original, MKI) to match X-600's instead. There is no problem with the impedance matching. The matching rate is quite healthy at 55 (X-600/REF 2 = 22k/0.4 [XLR] = 55). I like this combo because REF2 could add a bit more sweetness/warmness to the top end which is IMO the relative weakness of X-600's comparing to my previous Pass Aleph's. ARC REF2 + X-600's combo presents a pretty balanced - warm, sweet, dynamic and detail sounding. And also, it should be able to drive any kind of speakers...

Thanks for all of your comments/suggestions. I will look into the LS5 MK II as recommended.

I hate to say it but my experience with the Calypso has been very unsatisfactory. It sounded good when it worked properly--and customer service was very responsive--but after my third set of tubes I can't live with it anymore. Even on its good days I found it kind of noisey and began to miss the Accuphase CL-2800 I had demoed for a few weeks. I have decided to stay with tubes however and I think I'll give the ARC products a try.

Meisterkleef brought up an interesting point though--perhaps it is my Khorus MK II that is anemic. They are absolutely fantastic with accoustic music and vocals--strings and the female voice in particular. Piano though doesn't have the livliness and percussive impact I have heard on other systems. Same problem with bass and percussion on rock CD's/SACD's. Sounds "boxy" and the mid range seems compressed or closed. The bass seems muted. I understand that most rock recordings are poorly mixed and the speakers are very revealing... Was wondering if I should add powered subs, but the Talons are supposed to be great with rock recordings. What's going on? I've been staying away from a lot of the music that I love because it just doesn't sound "right" to me--but how much Bocelli and chamber music can a man take?

I have digressed. I'll give the LS5 or Ref 2 a try. If that doesn't work.... I may be in the market for Vandy 5A's! I'll keep you posted.