SS amp mosfet 'haze' - ever experienced this?


Tried a new amp in my system on the weekend: the well-reviewed Gamut D200 mkIII (partly based on HP's great review), a single-mosfet SS design. At the dealers' place, it sounded great (speakers were Wilson Benesch Discovery, an isobarak, lower-efficiency design). I can't use a tube amp right now (unfortunately!) due to pending child and the system is on a LOT (2-ch/HT mix), so am looking for the most full-bodied SS amp I can find (prefer fully balanced design to match my modded SF Line 3 pre).

Well, to my surprise, the amp did NOT work out as well at my place. My speakers are 97db Coincident Total Victory. Yes, it was full-bodied, but I was definitely aware of this haze, or veiling around each note. I have a friend who designs amplifiers, and he said that this is inherent of mosfet designs. I called Israel (Coincident) and he was not surprised that I only heard this once I got back to my place, due to the high resolution abilities of my speaker vs the speakers at the dealer's. I guess I will be sticking with my Sim Audio W-3, as it is much 'cleaner' on my system (given that I must stay with SS). Too bad, 'cause my Sim W-3 definitely has the edge in clarity, but the Gamut was a touch more full-bodied.

Has anyone else experienced this 'haze' with a mosfet-based design? I admit, those with higher-efficiency speakers like mine (97db/14ohm) probably are NOT using higher-powered mosfet designs anyways, but I would like to know how others feel about mosfet designs and this issue I had.
sutts
Sutts, Yes the Super E III's do tend to mate with a lot of different amps. You are lucky to live so close to "Izzy's" there in Toronto. I visited Toronto two or three years ago and phoned Israel Blume to get a tour of the Coincident factory. No go. He said that there were no Totals, Supers, or Victorys in house to hear, etc.
Kalan, Chip amps is just another misnomer, like digital amp. The proper nomenclature is Class D, another analog type. There are chips on the circuit boards. The circuitry board with all it's resistors, capacitors, and chips is called a module.

I don't mind the nick-name, "Chip amp."
Cdc:

agreed on the bi-polar aspect (and I am not descibing my personality, although my wife may disagree :-). They do have more raw power- case in point- my previous HT system consisted of a few pairs of rather inefficient Totem Mani-2 speakers that sounded great once 'pushed'- the amps I used on them (Sim Audio; Theta Dreadnaught) used bi-polars - they had more 'grunt' if you will, but the speakers needed it.

Nonoise:

thought about the First Watt, however the room is huge and I like to rock out sometimes- I think the FW might lack some balls- I could be wrong- just a feeling from experiencing the Pass Aleph 30 in the same system previously- a nice analog 'warmth', but not the greatest dynamically, and the noise floor too high for me...

However, I find greater 'purity' (I use the term somewhat loosely with solid state,- my Custom 45 2-watt tube amp over in 'system b' would disagree:-) with the best of the 'chip' amps- caveat- given a reasonbly efficient speaker. Perhaps so few parts translates to putting one closer to the music? It's an interesting discussion that would probably make a good thread- overall SS amp toplogies- their pros and cons. Again, speaker & room synergy is the key IMO...

Kalan:

not surprised- Izzy is a good guy, but he is real busy- he tends not to do auditions unless there is a good chance of a sale in it...

Mural:

what chip amps are you speaking of/using? I wonder how their topology would differ from the Audiosector Pateks...
I use the H2O Signature monos loaded with B&O's newly improved 500A modules. These modules require an add on power supply. There use to be an argument about which class D module sounded the truest. I believe B&O has put that argument to bed.