McIntosh MX119/134/135 pre/pro or Krell HTS 7.1

Aball,

Yeah, this really is an illogical silly disease. It seems once I attain my system goals...I still keep thinking "what if change..."

If I don't change anything...I should be happy...right. After all, it is just a stereo! What I have is far better than most people will ever hear, let alone own.

The bottom line...I don't have to change anything, but I will still ask questions because for me tuning the gear, refining its synergy and playing with the room acoustics is just as much fun as the listening itself. It just never ends.

Dave

An old update - I ended up trying a MX119 as a demo. It is really a nice piece physically. And the controls have a very nice feel to them. When I first set it on my shelf, it was as good as sold in my mind, I was very excited. I was even drafting up the sale ad for my Krell.

But, after a couple of hundred hours of break-in time, the Mac just did not sound as good as the Krell. Now I only tested it in 2-channel analog pass-through mode, so I cannot comment on the extensive feature set in the MX119. But in this configuration, the Mac did not let it all through. It seemed constricted and flat to me.

I even had a friend who is enamored with Mac over for a listen. This guy is a real die-hard Mac-fan, and definitely biased. However, in blind back-to-back tests, he repeatedly and quickly chose the Krell as his preference every time.

So, the beautiful Mac went back, and the steely industrial looking Krell remains (dare I say “ugly”). At least I know I tried, and also that the Krell is really a nice piece in spite of popular opinion here in Agon.

If you only use it in 2-channel mode, get a Mc 2-channel preamp and see what you think.

2-channel is what I am most critical of, but I do listen the some multi-channel, and my whole set-up began life as a HT. That is why I want to stick with a pre/pro.

Thanks though.