In what ways is Mark Levinson better than Krell?

I heard both integrated amps, I prefered the krell - more liquid sounding. For those who like Levinson, what do they see in it?

gonglee304-01-2005 9:31pm

mysearcher257 Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 48 posts 04-01-2005 at 10:13pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Service.
aggielaw Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 267 posts 04-01-2005 at 10:44pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Hmmm...good question for Richard Hardesty.
danielk141 Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 489 posts 04-01-2005 at 11:54pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete None, now that Harman International has them in limbo.
cello Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 645 posts 04-02-2005 at 12:36am Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete . Try listening to the older Levinson Amps like the 23.5 and 27.5. They are much more liquid and warmer than the Krell's. I have no use for the Levinson models made after the 23.5 and 27.5. The newer models sound dry, analytical and not very musical. . A great, great amp for the money is a used 23.5 that you should be able to find on Audiogon for around $ 2,500.00 - 2,700.00 if you wait. If you are not happy with a 23.5, you can easily re-sell it. I think that it is one of the best values in hi-end audio. . Good Luck . Rgds, Larry .
weiserb Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 476 posts 04-02-2005 at 12:43am Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Krell has great service. I heard that it took ML 3 months to fix a $ 6000.00 CD player.