MIT continued experience

I've used MIT in the past with good results, but its been a while. To be honest, their product line is so confusing I just get frustrated and look elsewhere.

Nordost, Morrow Audio, Kimber, Audioquest, I would try at least 2 of these. Also, this is a hard question to answer because of no system info and the lack of knowledge on our part, about what your trying to accomplish exactly with cables in your system.

Over the years, I've always found a consistent synergy with MIT cables and AQ cables when used together. I mainly use AQ DBS interconnects with MIT Shotgun speaker cables. I have stepped up to the MIT Oracle V3.2 IC's from my preamp to amp in the main rig and the use of the impedence matching network really demonstrated just how critical this function is not to mention the increased resolution and soundstage prowess the big MIT's bring.

I also use SR Resolution Reference SPEC cables for my REL subs and they match up great with the MIT speaker cables used on the main speakers. I did try a pair of AQ Volcano
DBS speaker cables and while they are very good in the resolution dept. they just don't quite have the slam and solidity that the MIT's do.

As always, YMMV.

I recently compared interconnects: MIT MA-X and Cardas Clear versus my old Audioquest Sky. I'm going with the MIT. The sound staging of the MIT is addictive.