Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart...RIP


Tomorrow, Dec 5th, is the 212 th anaversary of his death. Only 35 years old.

Another thread recently got sidelined into a stupid comparison of Beethoven vs Mozart, as if it was a zero sum game where one had to be downgraded so as to elevate the other. Tomorrow we should remember him, without question the greatest natural musical genius that ever lived. Truly Amadeus.
eldartford
How about that beautiful and magical duet from "Cosi Fan Tutte" that they used in the Shawshank Redemption? I'll toast to his genius!
Yu11375...The extent to which the Play/Movie embellished Mozart's life is debatable. That it did so to some extent is true. All stories on historical characters are "improved" a bit to make them more interesting, and this one is no worse than most. The one thing that really deviated from fact is the matter of Constanze, his wife. In life she was an talented pianist, and after Mozart's death she made a good living touring Europe and playing his work.

There is some historic record suggesting that Mozart suffered from Torette syndrome, as portrayed in the movie, and a rumor has been around for hundreds of years regarding Salieri's guilt in his death. Perhaps just a rumor, but it does make a great movie.
The movie “Amadeus” is entertaining. But manipulating historical information so intentionally to mistakenly portray Mozart and other related figures in order to simulate the interests of audiences is an act of moral unconsciousness and rather irresponsible.

Here is the detail information regarding the controversial subjects in the movie.

Title: “Amadeus” and Mozart Setting the Record Straight

http://www.mozartproject.org/essays/brown.html

It is a 17-page long essay written by Dr. A. Peter Brown who teaches in the School of Music at Indiana University.

If you are true Mozart fans, please do review it and share it with people who enjoy the movie “Amadeus”.

Happy Listening.

Otto
Yu11375...I read the essay. Thanks for the reference. It is packed with great detail about Mozart, far too much to be incorporated in a Play or movie. It is exactly what one would expect from a historian (my dad was one).

For example: Why did the movie leave out their children, who mostly died? Because that aspect, while historically true, had no bearing on the overall story, and would only weaken the dramatic impact. A very reasonable artistic decision, that would only annoy historians.

All in all, after reading the essay I still think that the movie runs as close to facts as most historically-based fiction, and the overall picture that it paints is very believable even if some of the "factual" details are only interpolations of reality.