Compiling info for Audiogon FAQ's


Given the fact that many questions are asked and discussed over and over again in these and other audio forums, i thought it might be a good idea if Audiogon developed a Frequently Asked Questions section.

We could do this by selecting common topics and then selecting individual responses or entire threads to reference for that subject. Since some threads may not be as "good" as others yet may contain VERY useful info hidden in a dozen posts, i think that being able to pick and choose the highlights of each subject and responses from the archives would be the best way to go. My thoughts are that an individual collection of "pearls of wisdom" that forum users find useful on individual subject might be better than listing an entire thread(s). Obviously, this would have to be done at Audiogon's discretion, but i don't think that they have a problem with making this a more user-friendly site and cutting down on the number of posts to moderate : )

This would allow people interested in a subject a quick way to find answers to the majority of questions without having to dig through the archives. On top of this, it may streamline the forums a bit, resulting in fewer "generic" questions being asked. This may open up the doors for both greater participation and diversity of questions since the basics will have been pretty well covered in the FAQ's.

With that in mind, let's open the forum up to suggestions on topics that should be "FAQ'ed" and how we can go about submitting threads / posts to be contained under those subject titles. While i've got a few suggestions of my own ( as usual : ) i'd like to see what you folks as end users want included and what Audiogon thinks about the subject. There have been some very helpful suggestions that i've found when doing searches and i'm sure that others would like to have their "quick picks" made available for others to learn from also. Sound like a plan ??? Sean
>

sean
Perhaps, there could be a place next to a post, for one to put a rating, such as *=good, **=better, ***=best. Should a post recieve X number of * it could be included in the FAQ or answers to the above.
This has got me thinking. Perhaps some of us could flatten out some of those speed bumps we've (like me) created. Many times (with appologies to Mose Allison) my mind is on vacation and my fingers are working overtime. Perhaps some of us could retract some Posts, with moderator approval of course. I can't remember all the times I've posted "after" when I meant "before" only to post a retraction and a follow up. This would be like a golfer replacing a divot.
I would like the FAQ to be based on concrete facts rather than popularity (if everyone thinks it is, then its true?).

The FAQ could be divided in to two sections: one on terms and basic, undisputed technicals and facts, and one section of links to threads on popular, controversial issues. Be careful in including FAQ topics that need to be updated, ex. CD volume control. You kids could make a fab FAQ (Rives and Sean are a great start), but there are some members who would rather use it as their throne.
Discussion of turntable/tonearm/cartridge setup
Discussion of record cleaning techniques
Disussion of biwiring and biamping techniques (not whether either are "good" or "bad")
Discussion of component impedance issues
Discussion of speaker sensitivity and OHM rating issues

NO battles of SS vs. Tube or Analog vs. digital
4yanx- The reason I feel that the highly controversial and perhaps never ending threads I suggested belong in the FAQ section is because they are something we talk about- and instead of starting a new one every few months just keep a long one going. Maybe its not what others want, but instead of seeing a new 'cds are better then LP's because....' thread popping up every few months these individuals could just add there thoughts to the already started topic. By doing this it would allow more room for new topics to come up. Again this is just my view and it could be out of place in the FAQ section(as another member has hinted at already).