Robotman,
I don't have any experience AT ALL with Spica speakers - let me make that very clear to you! Also my experience with NAD is very limited.
My brother used to own NAD gear some time back & what I did notice was that despite the small chassis the amp could put out quite high levels of current. They seem to have some proprietary voltage doubling circuits that allows the amp output stage to increase wattage & current.
So, from that experience & reading the specs it APPEARS that the NAD is better suited than the HK for low impedance/hard-to-drive speakers. It seems therefore it would output more current at a lower volume setting than would the HK.
However, if you have a sub & you can control the xover freq to something relatively high such as 100Hz or 120Hz then you can make the sub do all the low freq. work & still keep the HK. Why not do this?
(P.S. I did read your post re. problems with your sub. No experience there but *maybe* you need a new & better sub?)
I have a HK AVI200 in my HT setup & I know about the auto-shut off - I have played that 5-ch amp loud enough to invoke the auto shut-off! My amp also has a "loudness" button which emphasizes bass by 3dB at lower volume settings (testimony to the fact that the AVI200 power supply is pretty cheesy). When this loudness button is engaged I get bloated bass for 2-ch listening but for movies it's just fine as I'm looking for quantity more than quality. If your HK has such a loudness button, maybe you want to play with that? BTW, I engage the "direct" button on my HK so that it bypasses all the tone control circuitry (bass & treble knobs), which has a tendency to screw up sonics.
I don't have any experience AT ALL with Spica speakers - let me make that very clear to you! Also my experience with NAD is very limited.
My brother used to own NAD gear some time back & what I did notice was that despite the small chassis the amp could put out quite high levels of current. They seem to have some proprietary voltage doubling circuits that allows the amp output stage to increase wattage & current.
So, from that experience & reading the specs it APPEARS that the NAD is better suited than the HK for low impedance/hard-to-drive speakers. It seems therefore it would output more current at a lower volume setting than would the HK.
However, if you have a sub & you can control the xover freq to something relatively high such as 100Hz or 120Hz then you can make the sub do all the low freq. work & still keep the HK. Why not do this?
(P.S. I did read your post re. problems with your sub. No experience there but *maybe* you need a new & better sub?)
I have a HK AVI200 in my HT setup & I know about the auto-shut off - I have played that 5-ch amp loud enough to invoke the auto shut-off! My amp also has a "loudness" button which emphasizes bass by 3dB at lower volume settings (testimony to the fact that the AVI200 power supply is pretty cheesy). When this loudness button is engaged I get bloated bass for 2-ch listening but for movies it's just fine as I'm looking for quantity more than quality. If your HK has such a loudness button, maybe you want to play with that? BTW, I engage the "direct" button on my HK so that it bypasses all the tone control circuitry (bass & treble knobs), which has a tendency to screw up sonics.